Tamil Nadu

Thiruvallur

CC/47/2017

S.Vijayalakshmi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Eureka Forbes Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

C.P.Shibu Kumar

07 Sep 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
THIRUVALLUR
No.1-D, C.V.NAIDU SALAI, 1st CROSS STREET,
THIRUVALLUR-602 001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/47/2017
( Date of Filing : 06 Dec 2017 )
 
1. S.Vijayalakshmi
No.7/8, Rajput Street, Agaram, Subiksha Railview Appartment, 1st Floor, Chennai-82.
Thiruvallur
Tamilnadu
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Eureka Forbes Ltd.,
The Manager Director, Direct Sales, Eureka Forbes Ltd., Villivakkam, Chennai.
Thiruvallur
Tamilnadu
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M., PRESIDENT
  THIRU.R.BASKARKUMARAVEL, i c., B.Sc.,L.L.M.,BPT.,PGDCLP., MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:C.P.Shibu Kumar, Advocate
For the Opp. Party: M/s A.R.Poovanna & 2 Another, Advocate
Dated : 07 Sep 2018
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                                        Date of filling:         08.11.2017

                                                                                                        Date of Disposal:     07.09.2018

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

THIRUVALLUR -1

 

PRESENT: THIRU.S.PANDIAN.B.Sc., L.L.M.,                                               - PRESIDENT

THIRU:BASKARKUMARAVEL .B.Sc.,L.L.M., BPT., PGDCLP.,                    - MEMBER

 

CC.No.47/2017

FRIDAY, THE 07 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018

 

S.Vijayalakshmi,

No. 7/8, Rajput street, Agaram,

Subiksha Railview Apartments, 1st Floor,

Chennai -82.                                                           …….Complainant.

                                                //Verses//

 

Managing Director,

Direct Sales,

Eurekaforbes Limited

Villivakkam.                                                        …..opposite party

  

ORDER

PRONOUNCED BY THIRU S.PANDIAN, PRESIDENT.

 

 Complainant is called absent.  No other representation on the side of the complainant.  Proof Affidavit of the complainant not filed even posted today as No Further adjournment.  Hence passed it over to 1.00P.M.

At.1.00 P.M.

Complainant is called absent.  No other representation.  The Counsel also not appeared even today posted as No Further Adjournment with strict instruction to file Proof Affidavit today without fail.  Moreover, today also the complainant has not chosen to file the Proof Affidavit as his evidence.  It clearly shows the disinterest of the complainant to proceed with the complaint.  Therefore, there is no valid ground to prolong further since already given sufficient opportunity.

In the Result, considering all the facts and circumstances this complaint is Dismissed for default.  No Cost.

 

This order has been pronounced by us in the open Forum on this 07th September 2018.

 

 

    -Sd-                                                                                          -Sd-

MEMBER                                                                              PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[ THIRU.S.PANDIAN, B.Sc., L.L.M.,]
PRESIDENT
 
[ THIRU.R.BASKARKUMARAVEL, i c., B.Sc.,L.L.M.,BPT.,PGDCLP.,]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.