Kerala

Kozhikode

CC/135/2023

YAMUNA.A. P - Complainant(s)

Versus

EMIRATES FOOT WEAR, REP.BY MANAGER / OWNER - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jun 2023

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
KARANTHUR PO,KOZHIKODE
 
Complaint Case No. CC/135/2023
( Date of Filing : 29 Mar 2023 )
 
1. YAMUNA.A. P
PUTHIYEDATH KANDIYIL,PARANNUR P.O,NARIKKUNI,KOZHIKODE-673585
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. EMIRATES FOOT WEAR, REP.BY MANAGER / OWNER
NANMINDA ROAD,NARIKKUNI,KOZHIKODE
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE Member
 HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE

PRESENT : Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB : PRESIDENT

Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) :  MEMBER

Sri.V. BALAKRISHNAN, M Tech, MBA, LL.B, FIE: MEMBER

Friday the 30th day of June 2023

C.C.135/2023

 

 

Complainant

 

Yamuna A.P,

Puthiyedath Kandiyil,

Parannur (PO), Narikkuni (Via),

Kozhikode – 673 585.

 

   Opposite Party

          Emirates Foot wear

          Rep. by Manager/owner,

          Nanminda Road,

          Narikkuni, Kozhikode.

 

ORDER

By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN – PRESIDENT 

           This is a complaint filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

  1. The complainant has approached this Commission with an allegation that the chappal purchased by her from the shop of the opposite party on 06-03-2023 paying Rs.700/- became defective within 2 days as the sole damaged and opposite party  failed to take any positive steps to redress her grievance in spite of repeated requests. Hence the complaint claiming refund of the purchase price along with compensation.  

 

  1. The opposite party was set ex-parte.

 

  1. The points that arise for determination in this case are :
  1. Whether there was any unfair trade practice or deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party, as alleged ?
  2. Reliefs and costs.

 

  1. Point No.1 – The opposite party remained ex-parte. The case was posted for the evidence of the complainant several times. But the complainant also remained absent and did not file affidavit or adduce any evidence.  The fact that the opposite party was set ex-parte does not automatically entitles the complainant to get the relief sought for. It is for the complainant to prove the allegations in the complaint by adducing proper evidence. But the complainant in this case has utterly failed to prove her case. No deficiency of service or unfair trade practice as alleged is proved against the opposite party.

 

  1. Point No.2:  In view of the finding on the above point, the complainant is not entitled to get the relief sought for and the complaint is only to be dismissed. 

 

In the result, CC 135/2023 is dismissed. No order as to costs.

 

Pronounced in open Commission on this the 30th day of June 2022.

 

Date of Filing: 29-03-2023

                                                                  

                      Sd/-                                                                     Sd/-                                                                         Sd/-

             PRESIDENT                                                       MEMBER                                                              MEMBER  

 

APPENDIX

NIL

  

                     Sd/-                                                                       Sd/-                                                                       Sd/-

             PRESIDENT                                                         MEMBER                                                            MEMBER  

 

                                                                               True Copy,

                                                           

                                                                                                                                                                     Sd/-

                                                        Assistant Registrar.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. P.C .PAULACHEN , M.Com, LLB]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V. BALAKRISHNAN ,M TECH ,MBA ,LLB, FIE]
Member
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PRIYA . S , BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM)]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.