Kerala

StateCommission

A/09/663

Neunkandam Gramapanchayath - Complainant(s)

Versus

Elsamma George - Opp.Party(s)

P.G.Aravind

01 Feb 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/09/663
(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/12/2009 in Case No. CC 165/09 of District Idukki)
1. Neunkandam GramapanchayathKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. Elsamma GeorgeKerala ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 

     COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

          FIRST APPEAL:663/2009

                              JUDGMENT DATED:01..02..2010

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                :  PRESIDENT

 

The Secretary,

Nedumkandam Grama Panchayat,                    : APPELLANT

Nedumkandam, Idukki District.

 

(By Adv: M/s P.G.Aravind & M.Vysakh)

 

                   Vs.

 

Elsamma Jose,

Thakidiyel Veedu,

Mavadi.P.O,                                                        : RESPONDENT

Nedumkandam, Idukki District.

PIN 685 553.

 

                                      JUDGMENT

                                               

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

 

The appellant is the opposite party/Secretary, Nedumkandam Grama Panchayat in CC:165/09 in the CDRF, Idukki.  The appellant is under orders to issue the birth certificate of the daughter of the complainant.

2. The case of the opposite party is that the relevant register of birth for the period has been destroyed and hence they are not in a position to issue the birth certificate.

3. It is the case of the complainant that their daughter was born on 17..7..1990 at Community Health Centre, Nedumkandam.

4. The counsel for the appellant has contended that the appellant did not get an opportunity to contest the matter and that the proper procedure for the complainant is to approach the Sub Divisional Magistrate and on the direction of the Sub Divisional Magistrate the birth certificate can be issued.

5. We find that the contention of the appellant is without any logic. It appears that the stand of the appellant is that they will obey only the order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate.  We find that there is no scope for admitting the appeal.

In the result the appeal is dimissed in-limine.

The copy of this order will be forwarded to the Forum.

 

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

VL.

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 01 February 2010

[HONORABLE JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT