Jharkhand

Pashchimi Singhbhum

CC/10/2020

Mewa lal Honhaga - Complainant(s)

Versus

Electrical Engineer J.S.E.B Chaibasa - Opp.Party(s)

29 Jun 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDESSAL COMMISSION WEST SINGHBHUM CHAIBASA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2020
( Date of Filing : 23 Mar 2020 )
 
1. Mewa lal Honhaga
Mewa lal Honhaga S/O late suboddhi honhaga Tulsi Niwas matkam hatu po- Chaibasa PS Mufhasil West singhbhum
West Singhbhum
Jharkhand
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Electrical Engineer J.S.E.B Chaibasa
1 Pawan kumar misra Electrical Engineer J.S.E.B Chaibasa 2 Gautam rana Electrical Engineer J.S.E.B Chaibasa 3 Santosh kumar saw line man J.S.E.B. Chaibasa
west Singhbhum.
Jharkhand
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. VIJAI KUMAR SHARMA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. RAJIV KUMAR MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. DEOSHRI CHOUDHARY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 29 Jun 2022
Final Order / Judgement

                                                         Mawalal Honhaga………. Complainant

                                                                                   Vs

                                                       Executive Engineer…………….O.P

                                                                   J.S.E.B Chaibasa

 

                                                                ORDER

Case record is put up today for order. On Perusal of the case record we find that complainant Mewalal Honhaga of this case has files grievance in prescribed format against the O.P mentioning there in that

wrong meter has been installed in the name of wrong person and for realization of bill he is being threatened by the O.P and in this regard employee of the O.P has released Rs.30,000/- from him and despite complainant his grievance has not been settled the he has files this case before the forum  for an award of Rs.3,30,000/- including compensation towards mental and physical harassment.

 

After notice O.P assistant electrical engineer has sent a letter mentioning that actually  electric meter was installed at the house of complainant but his name has been wrongly mentioned and due to this mistake. Further that after correcting the name bill has also been corrected and complainant has paid the actual bill after correction. This fact has been again mentioned by the above engineer vide letter dated 11.04.22 and prayer has been made for disposed of the case on the basis of above facts and circumstances. After that complainant has appeared for this case and filed a petition for filing rejoinder against the above mentioned letter of O.P and he has admitted before the court that he is regularly using the electricity installed in his house. Since Adjournment has been given to the compliant for filing rejoinder of above letter which has not been done on behalf of the complainant. Further complainant is admitted that he is using electricity in his house. So we do not find any reason to disbelieve the letters sent by the O.P. So keeping in view the letters sent by O.P in this case we do not proper to proceed further in this case.

Rather instant case is disposed of in the light of the letter dated 04.11.20 and 11.04.22 sent by the O.P office to consign the record in record room.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. VIJAI KUMAR SHARMA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. RAJIV KUMAR]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. DEOSHRI CHOUDHARY]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.