Delhi

StateCommission

CC/1816/2017

SMT. SHALU GULATI & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

ELDECO INFRASTRUCTURE PROPERTIES LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

VARSHANT YADAV

23 Nov 2017

ORDER

IN THE DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL, COMMISSION : DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 Date of Arguments :  23.11.17

Date of Decision :       01.12.17

 Complaint No.1816/2017

IN THE MATTER OF:

 

1. Smt. Shalu Gulati

W/o Late Sunil Gulati

 

2. Sugam Gulati

S/o  late Shri  Sunil Kumar Gulati

 

3. Daksh Gulati

S/o late Shri Sunil Gulati

All r/o D-728 2^nd floors

Saraswati Vihar

Delhi-110034.                                                                                     ……..Complainants 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Versus

 

           

Eldeco Infrastructure Properties Ltd.

201-212, 2^nd Floor, Splendor Forum

Jasola District Centre

New Delhi.

Through its Director                                                                                        ……Respondents

 

CORAM

             

HON’BLE SH. O.P.GUPTA, MEMBER(JUDICIAL)

HON’BLE SH. ANIL SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER

1.     Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgement?                Yes

2.      To be referred to the reporter or not?                                Yes

SHRI O.P.GUPTA, MEMBER (JUDICIAL)

                                                          JUDGEMENT

                Complainant No. 1 is mother of complainant No. 2 & 3.  The case set up by the complainant is that husband of  complainant No. 1 booked industrial plot with the OP and deposited Rs. 15,77,850/- .  Her husband died on 31.08.16.  OP is wrongfully, illegally withholding said amount without any just and sufficient reason despite written requests and reminder.  Hence this  complaint for directing OP to pay Rs. 15,77,852/- alongwith interest @ 18% per annum, Rs.5,00,000/- compensation for mental torture, pain and agony on account of misconduct and arbitrary attitude.

2.            The complaint is still at the stage of admission.  Booking is for industrial purpose.  There is no averment  in the complaint that booking was done for earning livelihood by means of self employment. Thus the case of the complainant is not covered by explanation of section 2 (1) (d) of Consumer Protection Act.

                Complaint is dismissed in limini.

                Copy of the order be sent to both the parties free of cost,.

 

(ANIL SRIVASTAVA)                                                                                         (O.P.GUPTA)

MEMBER                                                                                             MEMBER(JUDICIAL)