Yane Komut filed a consumer case on 25 Oct 2007 against EE Power in the East Siang Consumer Court. The case no is CC/14/37 and the judgment uploaded on 30 Nov -0001.
Judgment/Order:
The brief of the case is that Smti Yane Komut PMRY beneficiary opened Ice Cream parlor T Tasubg building near Pane river, Pasighat. She apllied to power dept.,Pasighat Elect. Division for separate (Spl) power line to power line to her Ice cream shop for using deep freezer. After fulfillment of all formalities for separate line connection for applicant, the power department provides separate line of electricity to her Ice cream shop and was running her shop smoothly. But the power dept had suddenly cut off said separate line on 27th July 2005 without prior notice to the consumer which caused heavy loss to the Ice cream shop of Smti Yane Komut and bound Smti Komut to complaint to the President dist. Forum Pasighat for redressal of her grievances.
Under section 13 of the consumer protection Act 1986, the president, Dist Forum issued 30 days notice to the opp. Party to give his version of the case. After expiry of 30 days the Forum summoned both the parties and heard the case but couldn’t decide due to shortage of evidences, absent of one of the parties & for technical problem etc.
On this 25th Oct’07 same case has been heard & judged as per evidence of the case.
PMRY scheme is a central govt’s sponsored scheme for self employment of educated youths. As per consumer protection Act1986, goods purchased or service availed for the purpose of earning livelihood by way of self employment will not regarded as commercial purpose. So, complainant is identified as a genuine consumer.
1)It has been observed from evidence that consumer get separate connection electricity line after fulfillment of formalities like deposited security money and she has been paying monthly rent regularly. No faults are found on the part of complainant.
2)According to section56 sub section(1) of the electricity Act’s 2003 the department is to issue not less than 15 days period of notice to consumer before disconnection of the line.
Moreover, according to section 43,sub section(3) of the electricity Act 2003 the dept. shall be liable to penalty of Rs.1000/-(Rupees One thousand) only for each day of default from which the cause had taken place, But cause and evidence regarding disconnection are not found. So, negligence to the consumer on the part of department, Electric Division, Pasighat is established.
The complainant claim recovery of lost amount from power department as under:-
@ Rs.1000/- per day
4. Compensation due to mental injury Rs. 50000/-
Total Rs.594450
(Rupees Five lakhs Ninety Four thousand four hundred fifty) only
Considering consumer’s mental injury and financial loss due to clear breach of electricity Act by the power department Pasighat, this dist Forum passes the following order.
1. Power Department Pasighat Electrical Division Rs. 200000/-
Pasighat shall pay to consumer a Lump-
Sum of amount of Rs.200000/- Rupees two lakhs) only
Out of claimed amount of /rs 594450/- without calculating interest of the amount
2. Awarded compensation for mental injury. Rs 25000/-
3. Power Dep. Pasighat shall pay Rs.225000/-
(Rupees two lakhs twenty five thousand)
Total Rs. 225000/-
Only to Smti Yane Komut within #0 days of issue of this order.
Omem Moyong M. Ete
Member President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.