Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/144/2016

M/s. AIE Cars, The Manager - Complainant(s)

Versus

E. Kalaiselvan - Opp.Party(s)

Zaffarullah Khan

28 Apr 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.144/2016

 

(Against the Order dt.29.04.2016 made in C.C. No.99/2015 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu)

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF APRIL 2022

 

 

1. The Manager,

M/s. AIE Cars (A Unit of AI Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.),

No.183 A/1, Puliakkam Village,

Chengalpattu – 603 002.  

 

2. The Manager,

M/s. AIE Cars (A Unit of AI Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.),

East Coast Road,

Neelangarai,

Chennai – 600 115.                                                                                                     .. Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2.

-Versus-

 

1. Mr. E. Kalaiselvan,

S/o. Mr. G. Elumalai,

No.170, Ullavoor Village & Post,

Chengalpattu Taluk,

Kancheepuram District.                                                    

 

2. Mr. M.S. Prithivi Rajan,

S/o. Mr. M. Subramanium,

School Street,

Pazhaveli Village,

Venbakkam Post,

Chengalpattu Taluk,

Kancheepuram District.                                                                                .. Respondents 1 & 2 / Complainants 1 & 2.

 

3. The Manager,

M/s. Maruthi Suzuki India Limited,

Regd. Office, Plot No.1,

Nelson Mandela Road,

Vasant Kunj,

New Delhi – 110 071.                                           .. 3^rd Respondent  / 3^rd Opposite party.

 

Counsel for Appellants / Opposite parties 1 & 2           : M/s. Zaffarullah Khan

Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 / Complainants 1 & 2 : M/s. A.M. Rajesh

Counsel for 3^rd Respondent  / 3^rd Opposite party         : M/s. Dwarakesh Prabhakaran

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 28.04.2022 for appearance of both, for filing written arguments of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

Docket Order

No representation for the appellant and 3^rd respondent.   Respondents 1 & 2 present.  There was no representation for appellant for the past several hearings. 

This appeal is posted today for appearance of both, for filing written argument of appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                                                 Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                               R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT