Heard Mr.Dhayani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sudhir Kumar, one of the legal representatives of the deceased respondent/complainant.  Registry should have taken steps to correct the memo of parties according to the amended memo, as already directed on 10.07.2009.

2.      Shri Sudhir Kumar has produced an affidavit of Shri Randhir Singh, his elder brother (and the only other LR of the deceased respondent), to the effect that the latter has no interest in the subject matter of this dispute, i.e., the agricultural well and the pump set to be installed thereat.  A copy of this affidavit has been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner and the original is taken on record.

3.      Shri Sudhir Kumar states before us that he has already received from the petitioner Board the necessary material for laying the connection to his well, which has been lying with him since 1996.  He is also prepared to take necessary steps to expedite installation of the connection and energization of the tube well.  The petitioner Board is, therefore, directed to take steps to install and energize the tube well connection within 4 weeks from receipt of the connection material from the respondent/Shri Sudhir Kumar.  The amounts directed by the District Forum to be paid to the respondent seem to have been deposited with the District Forum.  The respondent (Shri Sudhir Kumar) shall be at liberty to withdraw the said amounts from the District Forum.

4.      In view of the settlement noted above, this revision petition is disposed of in the above-mentioned terms. 

5.      This order shall be brought to the notice of the State Commission in the context of the other revision petition No.163/2002, stated to be pending with the State Commission, so that the latter petition is also disposed of, at the earliest.  Order dasti.