West Bengal

Kolkata-I(North)

CC/10/241

Reeta Roy Chowdhury Malakar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dunlop India Ltd. and another - Opp.Party(s)

27 May 2013

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,
Unit-I, Kolkata
http://confonet.nic.in
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/241
 
1. Reeta Roy Chowdhury Malakar
122, Baghajatin Place, Kolkata-700086.
Kolkata
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Dunlop India Ltd. and another
46B, Chowringee Road, Kolkata-700071.
Kolkata
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. Sankar Nath Das PRESIDENT
 HON'ABLE MR. Dr. Subir Kumar Chaudhuri MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MRS. Samiksha Bhattacharya MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

In  the  Court  of  the

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit -I, Kolkata,

8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.

 

CDF/Unit-I/Case No.241/2010    

 

1)                   Smt. Reeta Roy Chowdhury Malakar

            @ Reeta Roy Chowdhury,

            Joy-Jayanti Apartment, 122, Baghajatin Place,

            P.S. Jadavpur, Kolkata-86.                                                                                  ---------- Complainant

 

---Versus---

 

1)                   Dunlop India Limited,

Represented by the Company Secretary,

Kings’ Court, Flat no. 14 & 18, 46B, Chowringee Road, Kolkata-70071.

Having Corporate office at 46B, Chowringee Road, Kolkata-700071.

 

2)                   Dunlop India Limited,

            Brach office-Sahaganj, P.S. Chinsurah, Dist. Hooghly.                                         -------- Opposite Parties

 

Present :           Sri Sankar Nath Das, President.

                        Dr. Subir Kumar Chaudhuri, Member.

                        Smt.  Samiksha Bhattacharya, Member

                                        

Order No.   26    Dated  27-05-2013.

 

            The case of the complainant in short is that complainant joined the o.p. company as cost trainee with effect from 4.2.1993 for a period of one year and was allowed a consolidated stipend of Rs.1500/- p.m. vide letter Ref. PKC/165/PM dt.2.3.1993 issued in the name of the complainant by the General Manager – Personnel of the o.p. company.

            Complainant successfully completed her training for the said one year and her training period was extended for further one year i.e. up to 3.2.1995 and the consolidated stipend was increased to Rs.1800/- p.m. with effect from 4.2.1994 vide letter Ref. SKC/5088/PM dt.27.1.1994 issued in the name of the complainant by the General Manager – Personnel of the o.p. company.

            The training period of the complainant was again extended for a further period of one year i.e. up to 3.2.1996 vide letter Ref. EPD/115/PM dt.1.2.1995 issued in the name of the complainant by the General Manager – HRD of the o.p. company.

            Complainant thereafter was appointed as Accounts Officer, Head Office of the o.p. company with effect from 1.1.1996 vide letter Ref. No.SRR/164/BR dt.31.1.1996 addressed to the complainant and the condition of her service as well as the salary and other receivables by the complainant were also informed to the complainant.

            The complainant worked with the o.p. company till 14.6.06 and tendered her resignation from service w.e.f. 15.6.06 vide letter of resignation dt.,14.6.06 duly received by the o.p. company.

            Immediately before tendering her resignation from service the complainant used to serve the o.p. company as Assistant Manager, Salary and Provident Fund and the complainant used to draw gross monthly salary of Rs.9075/- and net salary of Rs.8305/- after deduction of P.F. and P. Tax with the following structure :

 

__________________________________________________________________________________

Earning:

                                                                                                    (Rs)                      Total (Rs)

            Basic                                                                             5500

            H.R.A.                                                                           2200

            Allowances                                                                   1373                      9075

Less:     P. Fund                        660

              P. Tax                          110                       770

Net Salary                                                                                                               8305

 

            The complainant had to tender resignation from her service w.e.f 15.6.06 vide letter dt.14.6.06 addressed to the AVP Finance & Taxation of the o.p. company which was duly received and accepted by the o.p. company.

            Complainant duly served the o.p. company uninterruptedly from 4.2.1993 till 14. 12.06 but the complainant did not get her salary from the o.p. company for some period intermittently during the tenure of her service to the o.p. company and sometimes the o.p. company paid salary to the complainant at lower rate than the actual salary structure, to which the complainant was entitled. O.p. company also did not provide any Provident Fund statement to the complainant during the last part of her service. Complainant also did not get the LTA and Leave Salary of a huge amount from the o.p. company.

            The aforesaid outstanding dues and other allowances of the complainant was duly approved and certified by approved and certified by Mr. S. Ghose, the then AVP Finance & Taxation of the o.p. company vide statement dt.19.8.05. At the end of her service tenure the complainant also became entitled to the Gratuity amount as per terms of her service with the o.p. company.  

            Complainant after tendering her resignation from the o.p. company the o.p. company for payment of her legitimate dues vide letter dt.16.10.06 addressed to the Senior Vice President of the o.p. company mentioning interalia her entire claim in detail, which was duly received by the o.p. company.

            Having received no communication from the o.p. company the complainant issued reminders one after another and continued her claim for payment of her legitimate dues from the o.p. company, but in vain.

            Complainant wrote another letter addressing the Chairman of the o.p. company vide letter dt.27.10.09 with the same request and the said letter was duly received by the o.p. company. But the o.p. company did not respond to such letter as usual. Hence the case was filed by the complainant with the prayer contained in the petition of complaint.

            O.ps. did not file w/v. and the matter was heard exparte.

Decision with reasons:

            We have gone through the petition of complaint as well as entire materials on record and we find that the relation between the complainant and o.ps. happens to be employer and employee and such type of case does not fall within the ambit and scope of the C.P. Act, 1986, since this is a case absolutely in the nature of service matter.

            In view of the above position we are constraint to hold that the instant case is not maintainable and this Forum has got no statutory authority to adjudicate the matter.

            Hence, ordered,

            That the instant case no.241/2010 stands rejected exparte without cost.

            Complainant is at liberty to agitate this issue before the appropriate Forum on the self-same cause of action.

            Supply certified copy of this order to the parties free of cost.

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Sankar Nath Das]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'ABLE MR. Dr. Subir Kumar Chaudhuri]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MRS. Samiksha Bhattacharya]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.