Date of filing: 16.11.2017                                                                Date of disposal: 13.02.2020

Complainant:              Sharmila Banerjee, W/o. Gopal Chandra Banerjee, residing at Quarter No. 1230/B, Traffic Colony, near Children Park, Asansol, District: Paschim Bardhaman, PIN – 713 301.

- V E R S U S -

Opposite Party:           1. Dulu Chakraborty, D/o. Late Anil Kumar Chakraborty.

                                    2.  Anuj Chakraborty, S/o. Late Anil Kumar Chakraborty.

                                    Both are residents of 1 No. Mohishila Colony, Asansol, PS: Asansol South, District: Paschim Bardhaman, PIN – 713 303.

Present:

                        Hon’ble President: Smt. Jayanti Maitra (Ray).

Hon’ble Member: Shri Sailaranjan Das.

Appeared for the Complainant:                        Ld. Advocate,  Santi Ranjan Hazra.

Appeared for the Opposite Party Nos. 1 & 2:   Ld. Advocate, Prabir Chakraborty.

Order No. 27, Dated: 13.02.2020

Ld. Counsel for the complainant files hazira. Ld. Counsel for the OP Nos. 1 & 2 also files hazira. Shri Tushar Ranjan Behara, Law Officer on behalf of Central Bank of India is present and files memo of appearance.

The complainant and the OP No. 1 files a joint compromise petition supported by affidavit through their respective ld. Advocates stating that by intervention of common friends, inmates and well-wishers of both the parties to the case, the petitioners have agreed between themselves has been amicably settled amongst them on compromise in terms mentioned and agreed upon set out in the SCHEDULE – “A” of the compromise petition and the complainant prays for passing an order on compromise in final form for ends of justice and for interest of justice because both the parties want to end the litigation.

As the litigant parties by filing conjoint petition supported by affidavit have stated that the matter has amicably been settled out of this Forum and pray for dropping the present Consumer Complaint, we are of the considered view that the prayer of the parties should be allowed.

Hence, it is

O r d e r e d

that the present Consumer Complaint being No. 228/2017 be and the same is disposed of on compromise settlement. There is no order as to costs.

            Let plain copies of this order be supplied to the parties free of cost as per provisions of law.

Dictated & Corrected by me:                                                  (Jayanti Maitra (Ray)

                                                                                                        President

  (Sailaranjan Das)                                                          DCDRF, Purba Bardhaman

                Member

   DCDRF, Purba Bardhaman                                                                                                                       

(Sailaranjan Das)                                                                            Member                                                                          DCDRF, Purba Bardhaman