View 9723 Cases Against Mobile
Virender Singh s/o Sh.Om Nath filed a consumer case on 20 Feb 2017 against Duggal Mobile Centre in the Yamunanagar Consumer Court. The case no is CC/406/2016 and the judgment uploaded on 27 Feb 2017.
Virender Singh vs. Duggal Mobile etc.
CC No. 406 of 2016.
Present: Sh. Virender Singh complainant in person.
Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva, Advocate, counsel for OPs No.2 &3
Today the case was fixed for filing of written statement on behalf of OPs No.2 & 3. However, parties entered into compromise. Learned counsel for the OPs No.2 & 3 Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate offered an amount of Rs. 17000/- after deducting the depreciation amount from the billed amount subject to deposit of old hand set with all accessories (without broken and water logged). On the other hand, complainant accepted the offered made by the OPs No.2& 3. Statement of both the parties in this regard recorded separately.
In view of the statement of both the parties, the present complaint is hereby partly allowed as per compromise. OPs No.2 & 3 are accordingly directed to make the payment of Rs. 17000/- to the complainant subject to deposit of old mobile set alongwith accessories within a period of 30 days failing which the complainant shall be entitled to recover the interest at the rate of 7% per annum for the defaulting period. Both the parties shall be bound by their statements recorded separately. Copies of this order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs as per rules. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
Announced in open court.20.02.2017.
(S.C.SHARMA) (ASHOK KUMAR GARG)
MEMBER PRESIDENT
DCDRF,YAMUNANAGAR.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.