Orissa

Ganjam

CC/66/2023

Sri Trailokyanath Subudhi - Complainant(s)

Versus

DRM (Divisional Railway Manager) - Opp.Party(s)

Through SELF for the Complainant

25 Jul 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/66/2023
( Date of Filing : 26 Jun 2023 )
 
1. Sri Trailokyanath Subudhi
S/o Madhab Subudhi, At: Vellery, Po: Balugaon, Khordha - 752 030. Correspondence Address: At: Medical Bank Colony Lane 2, Near Medical Ground Hanuman Mandir, Brahmapur 760 004, Odisha.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. DRM (Divisional Railway Manager)
Khordha Road Division, At: Jatni, Khordha, Odisha 752 050.
2. GM(General Manager)
Rail Sadan, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar, Khordha, Odisha, 751 017.
3. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Railway Board
Under Ministry of Railways, Room No. 236, Rail Bhawan, Raisina Road, New Delhi 100 001.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Through SELF for the Complainant, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Through NONE for the Opp. Parties, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 25 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                                            DATE OF DISPOSAL: 25.07.2023

 

 

PER:   SRI SATISH KUMAR PANIGRAHI, PRESIDENT

           


               The Complainant-in-person is present today and files hazira. Heard at length and on perusal of the case record, it appears that the present complaint filed for deficiency in services under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the Railway Authorities. The case of the complainant hits the principles of Fundamental Rights of citizens under the Constitution of India. The present complaint cannot be decided summarily before this Commission.

               The law is well settled in O.P.Thalkur v. Shimla Municipal Corporation & Ors. reported in https://indiankanoon.org/doc/169279808/ where in Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held that, “the Consumer Protection Fora do not enforce fundamental rights and also do not exercise jurisdiction of Hon’ble High Courts or Hon’ble Supreme Court of India under Art. 226 or 32.”

               In view of the above terms, the complaint is dismissed with liberty to the complainant to seek remedy in a competent court as per the law. The present Consumer Complaint stands disposed of accordingly.

               The Judgment be uploaded on the www.confonet.nic.in for the perusal of the parties.

               A certified copy of this Judgment be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 or they may download same from the www.confonet.nic.in to treat the same as if copy of the order received from this Commission.

               The file is to be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this Judgment.

 

Pronounced on 25.07.2023.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.