Kerala

Wayanad

CC/45/2019

George Thomas, S/o Thomas, Nathanam Thadathil House, Vaduvanchal (po), Thomattuchal, Bathery Taluk, Proprietor/Manager - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dream Solar, XV/213(11) Vinayaka, Kalpetta (po) - Opp.Party(s)

07 Aug 2020

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
CIVIL STATION ,KALPETTA
WAYANAD-673122
PHONE 04936-202755
 
Complaint Case No. CC/45/2019
( Date of Filing : 02 Apr 2019 )
 
1. George Thomas, S/o Thomas, Nathanam Thadathil House, Vaduvanchal (po), Thomattuchal, Bathery Taluk, Proprietor/Manager
Thomattuchal
Wayanad
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Dream Solar, XV/213(11) Vinayaka, Kalpetta (po)
Kalpetta
Wayanad
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ananthakrishnan. P.S PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Beena M MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. A.S Subhagan MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 07 Aug 2020
Final Order / Judgement

By Smt. Beena. M,  Member:

 

This is a complaint filed under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986.

 

2. Complainant’s case in brief is as follows:-  The case of the complainant is that  the Complainant approached  the Opposite Party  to purchase a  solar water heater and as per  his direction the  Complainant had purchased a Solar Water heater, 150 LPD ETC PC from the Opposite Party  for an amount of Rs.23,000/- on 03/09/2016 under invoice No135 and it was installed by the Opposite Party in the house of  the Complainant on  the same day.  The capacity of the Water heater is 150 litre.  At the time of purchase, the Opposite Party assured  5 years’ warranty for the product.   After one year of  installation,  the water heater became defective, as the water coming out from the water heater was dirty.  The complainant informed the opposite party about the defect of the water heater and the Opposite party came and repaired it. But while the complainant  was using the water heater again the same defect had occurred. The complainant informed the defect on August 2018 to the opposite party and  the workers of the opposite party came to the complainant’s house and inspected the water heater and rectified the defect. The solar water heater became again defective in the first week of October 2018. The Complainant informed the same to the Opposite Party, but  he had not taken any steps to cure the defect and the water heater again became useless. The Complainant approached the opposite party and asked to replace the defective water heater under the warranty  but he was not willing to replace it. The failure on the part of the  opposite party to rectify the defects even after repeated attempts would substantiate the fact that the water heater supplied to the complainant was defective. It is the duty of the Opposite Party to replace the water heater with a new one. So the Complainant is  praying for directing the Opposite Party to replace the water heater with new one or refund RS.23,000/-, the price of the solar water heater along with interest@ 12% per annum.   The Complainant is also seeking RS. 10,000/- towards compensation and RS. 5,000/-  towards  cost. Hence  this  complaint.

 

          3. After registration of the above number complaint, the Forum issued notice to the opposite party and he was duly served  and he appeared before the Forum but he failed to file version and the Forum set him ex- parte.  

On perusal of the complaint and documents the Forum raised the following points for consideration:-

          1. Whether there is   any deficiency in service and unfair trade practice  from   

              the part of the opposite party?

2. Whether the Complainant is entitled to get refund of the price of the

      product?

           3.  Whether the complainant is entitled to get compensation?

           4. Relief and cost.

 

4. From the side of the Complainant, he has appeared  before the forum and submitted proof affidavit, in which he has affirmed and explained all the contentions stated in the Complaint  in detail. He has also produced two documents, which were marked as Exhibits A-1 and A-2. Ext. A1 is the warranty card and Ext. A2 is the cash invoice.

 

5.  Point No. 1 & 2 :-  For the sake of convenience the point No. 1 and 2 are considered  together:-

         The case of the Complainant is that he had purchased a solar  water heater from the Opposite Party. The product has 5 year warranty and  during the warranty period the product became defective. When he complained about the defect of the product, the Opposite Party’s authorized staff came to the house of the Complainant & rectified it. In the second time also the defect was cured. Complainant’s case is that after the rectification of the product the second time, again the same defect occurred. So the Complainant contacted the Opposite Party but Opposite Party did not respond to Complainant’s request. The Complainant sustained much mental agony & hence filed this complaint  alleging deficiency  in service on the part of the Opposite party. The Complainant adduced  oral evidence and documents produced were marked as Ext. A1 & A2. Ext. A1 is the warranty card & Ext. A2 is the invoice dated  03/09/2016. From the documents it can be seen that the   the complainant had purchased the solar water heater  from the Opposite Party by paying Rs.25,000/- on 03/09/2016 . On going through the Ext. A1,  it can be seen that the problem of the solar water heater had  started & rectified  again and again, and the  complaint  had occurred during the warranty period. According to the Complainant, the product is defective and he could not use the same. Since the  defects arose within the warranty period, the Opposite Party is liable to rectify the defect or replace or refund the price of the product. But the Opposite Party failed to rectify  the defect  during the warranty period.  The Opposite Party, even after getting notice from the forum failed to appear before  the forum. There is no contra evidence adduced on  behalf of the Opposite Party and the allegation of the Complainant remains unchallenged. In the  absence of Opposite Party’s evidence, there is nothing to disbelieve the claim of  the complainant. Therefore, there has been  deficiency in service from the side of the opposite party.  

 

6. On going through the available records and submissions, the Forum found that there is deficiency in service  from the side of the opposite party and he has sustained some difficulties. Hence the points are found infavour of the complainant.

 

6.  Point No.3 and 4   Since Point No.1 and 2 are found against the opposite party, he is liable to pay a reasonable compensation and costs  to the complainant.

         

In the result, the complaint is allowed as follows:-  The opposite party is directed to replace the old Water heater  with a new one free of cost or to pay the purchase price Rs. 23,000/-   (Rupees Twenty three thousand only) to the complainant.  The Opposite Party is  further directed to pay to a compensation of Rs.5,000 (Rupees Five thousand only ) towards the mental agony and inconveniences suffered by the Complainant.  The Opposite Party is also directed to pay   cost of  Rs.3,000  (Rupees Three thousand only) to the Complainant.  Failing which, the Complainant is entitled to get 12% interest for all the amounts  shown above till realization.  The   above  order  shall  be  complied  within 30 days from the date of receipt of this Order.

 

          Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by him and corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Forum on this the  day of  7th  August 2020.

                                                                                                PRESIDENT:   Sd/-

                                                                                                MEMBER   :   Sd/-

                                                                                                MEMBER  :    Sd/-

 

APPENDIX.

Witness for the Complainant.:-

PW1.              George Thomas.                             Complainant.          

Witness for the Opposite Party:-

Nil.                             

Exhibits for the Complainant:    

A1.      Warranty Card.

A2.      Invoice (Form No.8B)                  dt:03.09.2016 

Exhibits for the Opposite Party:-

Nil.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ananthakrishnan. P.S]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Beena M]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. A.S Subhagan]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.