Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/14/196

S .Rajasekharan Nair - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr.Suresh prabhakar - Opp.Party(s)

25 Mar 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

          SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

           SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR : MEMBER

                                        SRI.VIJU.V.R                  : MEMBER

CC.NO.196/2014 (Filed on : 22/05/2022 )

ORDER DATED : 25.03.022

COMPLAINANT

S.Rajasekharan Nair,

(Retd Electrical Engineer,

Government of Kerala)

TC.14/2030(1), Sree Towers, First Floor,

Vanrose Junction, University.P.O

(Near Culture Centre, ABT Parcel Service)

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 034

(Party in person)

                                                VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1. Dr.Suresh Prabhakar,

Urologist, India Hospital,

Mele thampanoor, (Housing Board Junction

Near Gandhari Ammankovil)

•  

2. Dr.Saroja Nair,

Nephrologist, India Hospital,

Mele thampanoor, (Housing Board Junction

Near Gandhari Ammankovil)

•  

3. The Managing Director,

India Hospital,

Mele thampanoor, (Housing Board Junction

Near Gandhari Ammankovil)

•  

(OP1 by Adv.K.P.Omanakuttan)

(OPS 2 & 3 by Adv.P.Praveen)

6698606.  

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

                        This complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

          2.       This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegation of deficiency in service raised by the complainant. When the case came up for consideration today, the wife of the complainant filed a memo stating that the complainant expired on 10.08.2021 and she further stated that in view of the death of the complainant the legal heirs of the complainant are not interested to further proceed with this complaint. The memo filed by the widow of the complainant is recorded and accepted. In view of the death of complainant and the memo filed by the widow of the complainant stating that they are not willing to further proceed with this case, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed.

                     In the result, complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

              A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

        Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 25^th day of March 2022.

                                                                         Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                      Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

 

                                                                                          Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

 

 

 

Be/

 

 

 

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES

 REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACADU

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

CC.No.196/14

ORDER DATED: 25.03.2022