Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/95/2015

Mrs.B.V.Vaishanavi, W/o.K.S.Dharmaprakash - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr.Sridevi, M.D.DGO, Devi Hospital, and anr - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.M.Ravi

31 Jul 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                            MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.95/2015

DATED THE 31^ST DAY OF JULY 2023

Mrs. B.V. Vaishanavi,

W/o. Mr. K.s. Dhamaprakash,

Flat No.208, A5 Wing,

Rose Icon, Pimple Saudagar,

Pune – 411 027.                                                                                    .. Complainant.                                                   

- Versus –

1. Dr. Sridevi,

Devi Hospital,

Near Co-operative Kalyana Mandapam,

No.136/76, New Fairlands,

Salem – 636 016.

 

2. M/s. Devi Hospital,

No.136/76, New Fairlands,

Near Co-operative Kalyana Mandapam,

Salem – 636 016.                                                                           .. Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                        : M/s. M. Ravi

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 2        : M/s. AAV Partners

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 31.07.2023                                                             for appearance of the complainant, for filing written arguments of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court: 

                                                    Docket Order

 

Opposite parties 1 & 2 present and ready for arguments. No representation for the complainant.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of the complainant, for filing written arguments of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M., still, there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No costs.

 

 

               Sd/-                                                                                         Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                       PRESIDENT