Delhi

North West

CC/1044/2016

ISHWARI PRSAD - Complainant(s)

Versus

DR.R.K.SUNKARIA & ORAS. - Opp.Party(s)

06 Aug 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/1044/2016
( Date of Filing : 06 Oct 2016 )
 
1. ISHWARI PRSAD
A-4/B,SHYAM COLONY,PHASE-II,BUDH VIHAR,DELHI-110086
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. DR.R.K.SUNKARIA & ORAS.
B-2/33,SEC-6,BEHIND AMBEDKAR HOSPITAL GATE NO.5,ROHINI,DELHI-85
2. NAVNEEVAN HOSPITAL
A-12,PUSHPANJALI ENCLAVAE,OPP.JAIPUR GOLDEN RED LIGHT,OUTER RING ROAD,PITAMPURA,DELHI-88,THORUGH ITS MEDICAL OFFICER,PROP./PARTNER
3. ICICI LOMBORD INS.
1ST FLOOR,DDA MARKET,J&K,DILSHAD GARDEN,DELHI-110095
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. M.K.GUPTA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. USHA KHANNA MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. BARIQ AHMAD MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 06 Aug 2018
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NORTH-WEST

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

CSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.

 

CC No: 1044/2016

ISHWARI PRASAD                              … COMPLAINANT

 

Versus

 

 

Dr. R.K. SUNKARIA & ORS.… OPPOSITE PARTY (IES)

                   

COMPLAINT U/S 12 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986

 

CORAM:SH. M.K. GUPTA, PRESIDENT

SH. BARIQ AHMED, MEMBER

       MS. USHA KHANNA, MEMBER

        

 

        

ORDER                       Date: 06.08.2018

SH. BARIQ AHMED, MEMBER

 

Heard Sh. Dheeru Nigam, Counsel for OP-1 & OP-2 and Ms. Esha Verma, Counsel for OP-3. Perused file. It is true that none is appearing for the complainant since last dates of hearings i.e. 03.05.2018& 06.08.2018 consecutively. Several calls have been given since morning. But none on behalf of the complainant has appeared. Moreover, written statement by OP-1 & OP-2 has been filed on 20.03.2017 and despite giving several opportunities, the complainant has failed to file rejoinder & his evidence. Moreover, last opportunity was also given to the complainant subject to imposition of cost.

In these circumstances, it appears that the complainant is not interested in pursuing his case. It will be abuse of process to proceed further in the absence of the complainant. Hence complaint is dismissed in default for the reasons mentioned above. File be consigned to record room.

Announced on this 6th day of August, 2018.

 

 

 

(MEMBER)                          (MEMBER)                              (PRESIDENT)

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. M.K.GUPTA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MS. USHA KHANNA]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. BARIQ AHMAD]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.