Haryana

StateCommission

A/184/2016

BALRAJ SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

DR.MONIKA SHEORAN - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

03 Feb 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                                          First Appeal No.:          184 of 2016                                                       Date of Institution: 01.03.2016

                                                          Date of Decision:  03.02.2017

 

Balraj Singh son of Sarup Singh, resident of VPO Chhithroli, District Mohindergarh (Haryana).

…Appellant-Complainant

Versus

 

1.      Dr. Monika Sheoran (BAMS),

 

2.      Sanjivni Hospital and Lavya Nursing Home, Ambedkar Chowk, Near Govt. Hospital Kanina (Mohindergarh).

 

...Respondents-Opposite Parties

 

CORAM :  Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

                  

Present :    None for the appellant.

 

O R D E R

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          Balraj Singh-Complainant has filed the instant appeal on March 01^st, 2016 against the order dated February 01^st, 2016 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Narnaul, whereby complaint was allowed. For ready reference, operative part of the order is reproduced as under:

“To pay Rs.5,00,000/- (five lacs) to the complainant alongwith interest at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of filing of the complaint till realization.

To pay Rs.2200/- as litigation charges to the complainant.”

The case was listed for March 31^st, 2016. On that date, none appeared on behalf of the appellant and the case was adjourned to May 16^th, 2016. On May 16^th, 2016 again none appeared on behalf of the appellant, case was adjourned to June 06^th, 2016. On June 06^th, 2016 the case was adjourned to July 14^th, 2016 on the written request of learned counsel for the appellant. On July 14^th, 2016, September 27^th, 2016 and December 15^th, 2016 adjournments were sought by the learned counsel for the appellant. Today case called several times since morning. But none has appeared on behalf of the appellant. Perusal of record shows that the appellant is not interested in pursuing this appeal. This being so, the appeal is dismissed in default.

 

February 03rd  2017 (D.R.)

B.M. Bedi Judicial Member

Nawab Singh President