Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/133/2018

M/s. Home Life Furniture Company - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr.M. Muneeswaran S/o. Mr.M.Munaiah - Opp.Party(s)

M. Muniruddin Sheriff

22 Nov 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.133/2018

 

(Against the Order dt.13.11.2017 made in C.C. No.417/2006 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chennai (South))

DATED THE 22^ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022

 

M/s. Home Life Furniture Company,

Represented by its Managing Director,

No.153, Eldams Road,

Teynampet,

Chennai – 600 018.                                                            .. Appellant / Opposite party

-Versus-

 

Dr. M. Muneeswar,

S/o. Mr. M. Munaiah,

No.67, Pillaiyar Koil Street,

Officer Colony,

Porur,

Chennai – 600 116.                                                        .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for Appellant / Opposite party : M/s. M. Muniruddin Sheriff

Respondent / Complainant                   : Served called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 22.11.2022 for appearance of appellant and for filing written arguments of appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for the appellant.   There was no representation for the appellant for the past several hearings.

This appeal is posted today for appearance of the appellant, for filing written arguments of the appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there is no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

               

               Sd/-                                                                                                       Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT