Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/225/2017

Varun, Rep by his Father,K.Ramesh kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr.D.Bakthavathasalam, Chairman, K.G.Hospitals & anr - Opp.Party(s)

C.Kulanthaivel

31 Aug 2021

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/225/2017
( Date of Filing : 26 Aug 2015 )
 
1. Varun, Rep by his Father,K.Ramesh kumar
D.No.11/2, Valaraigate, Velur Road, Animoor Post, Tiruchen
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Dr.D.Bakthavathasalam, Chairman, K.G.Hospitals & anr
No.5, Government Arts College Road, Coimbatore
2. Dr.V.P.Shanmugasundaram, Chief Surgeon,K.G.Hospitals
No.5,Government Arts College Road, Coimbatore
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                             PRESIDENT

                         Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

C.C. No.225/2017

                                                               DATED THE 31ST  DAY OF AUGUST  2021

 

Minor VARUN

Rep. by his Next Friend / Guardian /

Father, K. RAMESHKUMAR,

D.No, 11/2, Valaraigate , Velur Road,

Animoor Post, Triuchengode Taluk,

Namakkal District.                                                                                                                .. Complainants.

-Versus-

1. Dr. D. Bakthavathsalam,

Chairman, K.G. Hospitals,

No.5, Government Arts College Road,

Coimbatore.

 

2. Dr. V.P. Shanmugasundaram,

Chief Surgeon, K.G. Hospitals,

No.5, Government Arts College Road,

Coimbatore.                                                                                                                                    .. Opposite Party.

 Counsel for the complainant                    : M/s. C. Paraneedharan

 Counsel for the opposite party 1 & 2       : M/s. Iyer & Thomas

          This consumer complaint coming up before us on 31.08.2021 for appearance of both and for arguments this Commission made the following:-                                            

Docket order

            No representation for complainant. Opposite parties present. Proof affidavit of complainant not filed. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant & for filing proof affidavit or for dismissal. Complainant remained absent for the past many hearings. Today also there is no representation for the complainant. The complaint is of the year 2017. Now almost four years completed. But the complainant had not taken any efforts to appear and file their proof affidavit and conduct the case. The absence of the complainant shows that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore no useful purpose will be served in keeping the complaint on file. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No cost.

 

                   Sd/-                                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. TMT.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESHWARI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.