NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/1052/2008

SPICEJET LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

DR.BHAGAT SINGH SEHRAWAT - Opp.Party(s)

MR. UMESH GULATI

09 Jul 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1052 OF 2008
(Against the Order dated 01/07/2008 in Appeal No. 864/2007 of the State Commission Chandigarh)
1. SPICEJET LTD319, UDHYOG VIHAR PHASE - II, GURGAON - 122 016 HARYANA ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. DR.BHAGAT SINGH SEHRAWATHOUSE NO.2591, SECTOR 19-C, CHANDIGARH2. DR.BHAGAT SINGH SEHRAWATHOUSE NO.2591, SECTOR 19-C, CHANDIGARH ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 09 Jul 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Heard Counsel for the Petitioner. There are concurrent findings of two fora below. The fora below have considered all the relevant aspects while passing orders in question. The compensation awarded is just, reasonable and equitable in the facts and circumstances of the case and it does not call for interference in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 21(b) of Consumer Projection Act, 1986 as we do not find any jurisdictional error, illegality or material irregularity in the order of the fora below. The revision is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.


......................JR.K. BATTAPRESIDING MEMBER
......................VINAY KUMARMEMBER