Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/100/2018

T. Krishnamurthy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr.B. Subbarao M.D, DNB - Opp.Party(s)

C.P. Suresh

28 Feb 2023

ORDER

 

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                         Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                             MEMBER

                     

C.C. No.100/2018

DATED THE 28^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

1. Tiruvaipati Krishna Murthy (Died),                                                   ... Complainant.

 

2. Tiruvaipati Anil Krishna,

S/o. Late Krishnamurthy,

 

3.  Tiruvaipati Saraswathi,

W/o. Late Krishnamurthy,

 

4. Tiruvaipati Lakshmikala,

D/o. Late Krishnamurthy.          

All the LRs are residing at:

No.25-1-2033, Santhi Nagar,

Nellore,

Nellore – II (U).                                                                                    … Legal representatives / Proposed Complainants.                                                                                            

 

- Versus –

1. Dr. B. Subbarao, MD (DNB),

HOD,

Senior Consultant of Nephrology,

Apollo Hospitals,

No.21, Greams Lane,

Off Greams Road,

Chennai.

 

2. Dr. Pratap Reddy,

Chairman,

Apollo Hospitals,                                                                                               

No.21, Greams Lane,

Off Greams Road,

Chennai.                                                                                          … Opposite parties.

 

Counsel for the complainant                      : M/s. C.P. Suresh

Counsel for the opposite parties                : M/s. Maimoona Badsha

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 28.02.2023 for appearance of the complainant and for filing proof affidavit of the complainant (as last chance) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                      

 

Docket Order

 

Opposite party present. No representation for the complainant.  This matter is adjourned for filing proof affidavit of the complainant for the past several hearings.  Though sufficient opportunities were given to the complainant, he has neither appeared nor filed his proof affidavit.

Today, this matter is posted for appearance of the complainant and for filing proof affidavit of complainant as last chance or for dismissal.  

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M. there was no representation for complainant.   Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 01.00 P.M. but the complainant has neither represented nor filed his proof affidavit.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this consumer complaint is dismissed for default for non-filing of proof affidavit.   No costs.

 

 

                 Sd/-                                                                                                        Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                         R.SUBBIAH                        

             MEMBER                                                                                          PRESIDENT