West Bengal

StateCommission

FA/08/183

Reshmi Parvin alias Reshmi Khatoon. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. Urmi Chaudhury. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Habibur Rahaman.

24 Sep 2008

ORDER


STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION , WEST BENGAL.
BHAWANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor) , 31 Belevedre Road , Kolkata – 700027
Appeal(FA) No. FA/08/183

Reshmi Parvin alias Reshmi Khatoon.		 ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Dr. Urmi Chaudhury.
Rishra Seva Sadan.
The Medical Superintendent.
The Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare.		 ...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. S N BASU 2. SMT. SILPI MAJUMDER

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


For the Appellant :


For the Respondent :




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

24.09.2008.

 

SRI S. N. BASU, MEMBER.

 

Appellant through Mr. A. Mukherjee, the Ld. Advocate and Respondent No. 3 through Mr. Sujoy Kr. Basu, the Ld. Advocate is present.  Respondent No. 2 is absent on calls.  The Appellant submits that the order of the Ld. Forum below dated 10.03.2008 was passed without taking any evidence from either side.  The matter was also not heard on merit.  The order is, therefore, considered superficial and not in accordance with law.  He prays for remanding the case to the Forum below for proper adjudication after both sides are allowed to file evidence and the matter is heard on merit.  The Ld. Advocates for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 also agree with the contention of the Appellant.  It is accordingly ordered that the case be sent to the Forum below on remand for hearing afresh after directing both sides to adduce evidence and also for cross-examination of the evidence as might be adduced by the respective sides.  The matter should be heard on merit and the dispute be decided as per law within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the order.  The appeal be allowed on contest without cost.  The order of the Ld. Forum below is set aside.

 




......................S N BASU
......................SMT. SILPI MAJUMDER