Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/18/386

Amrutha Kiran R - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. Somervell Memorial - Opp.Party(s)

09 Jan 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

               SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

          SMT.PREETHA G NAIR     : MEMBER

          SRI.VIJU.V.R                        : MEMBER

CC.NO.386/18 (Filed on : 25/10/2018)

ORDER DATED : 09/01/2023

COMPLAINANT

Amrutha Kirana.V.R
TC.75/1115, Treesa Cottage,

Chayakudy Road, Pettah,

Thiruvananthapuram

(By Advs.S.Vikraman & V.Dinesha)

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

  1. Dr.Somervell Memorial C.S.I.Medical College,
  2.  

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 504

  1. The Principal,

Dr.Somervell Memorial C.S.I

Medical College, Karakkonam,

Thiruvananthapuram – 695 504

(By Adv.Mridhul John Mathew)

ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2. This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties. Both the parties entered appearance and failed to file any written version and hence the counsel appearing for the opposite party reported no instruction and on 30/05/2022, both the opposite parties called absent and set exparte. Subsequent to that number of opportunities were given to the complainant to file proof affidavit to proceed with the complaint. As the complainant was continuously absent, this commission issued a notice to the complainant to appear before this commission today to further proceed with this complaint. The notice issued to the complainant was seen accepted. When the case came up for consideration today the complainant was absent and there is no representation from the side of the complainant. In view of the continuous absence of the complainant and non filing of proof affidavit inspite of giving sufficient opportunities, we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint. In the above circumstances, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed for default.

               In the result, complaint is dismissed for default. There will be no order as to costs.

     A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

        Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 9th day of January 2023.

                                                                            Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

                                                                                      Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                                                                                              Sd/-

VIJU.V.R    : MEMBER

  

 

Be/

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.