Uttarakhand

StateCommission

A/179/2019

Tata Motors Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. (Smt.) Rashmi Gupta nee Agarwal - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. S.K. Gupta

25 Jul 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
First Appeal No. A/179/2019
( Date of Filing : 06 May 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/02/2019 in Case No. 64/2014 of District Haridwar)
 
1. Tata Motors Ltd.
2,A7B 20th floor, One India Bulls Center, Senapati Bapat Marg, Elphinstone Road,
Mumbai
Maharastra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Dr. (Smt.) Rashmi Gupta nee Agarwal
w/o Nagesh Agarwal r/o 521/C, 53- Civil Line, Roorkee,Teh. Roorkee,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
2. managing Director, Fiat India Automobiles Ltd.
Reg. office& Factory B-19 Ranjangaon MIDC Industrial area,Ranjangaon, Taluka-Shirur
Pune
Maharastra
3. managing Director, I. S. Motors (P) Ltd.,
6th Km. Stone, Roorekee Highway, Roorkee,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Jul 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

Sh. B.K. Tyagi, learned counsel for the appellant; Sh. Vibhor Maheshwari, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and Sh. Ashutosh Singh Gusain, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, are present.  None is present on behalf of respondent No. 3.

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 states that the impugned judgment and order dated 20.02.2019 passed by the District Commission, Haridwar, has been complied by respondent No. 2 and the vehicle in question has been handed over to respondent No. 1 / complainant in running condition and the amount of Rs. 5,000/- towards compensation and costs, which was directed to be paid to respondent No. 1 / complainant, has also been paid by respondent No. 2.

Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 / complainant states that the impugned judgment and order dated 20.02.2019 passed by the District Commission, has been fully complied by respondent No. 2 and nothing remains to be complied with in furtherance of impugned judgment and order dated 20.02.2019 passed by the District Commission.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that in the light of aforesaid statements given by learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 today, this appeal has rendered infructuous.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed, as having become infructuous.

The amount deposited by the appellant with this Commission, be released in its favour.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.