Punjab

Amritsar

CC/16/419

Rajinderjit Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. Sanjiv Verma - Opp.Party(s)

07 Sep 2016

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
SCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit Avenue
Amritsar
Punjab
 
Complaint Case No. CC/16/419
 
1. Rajinderjit Singh
VPO Manawala, Amritsar
Amritsar
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Dr. Sanjiv Verma
Jandiala Guru Town, Amritsar
Amritsar
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Sh. S.S.Panesar PRESIDENT
  Anoop Lal Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 07 Sep 2016
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

 

Order dictated by:

Sh.S.S. Panesar, President.

1        Sh. Rajinderjit Singh has brought the instant complaint  u/s 11 & 12 of the Consumer Protection Act on the allegations that complainant is  permanent resident of India. The complainant had teeth and gum problem since long and he felt pain in his teeth. On 2.8.2016 complainant met so called doctor namely Chandan Verma , who examined the complainant and gave him some medicine and injection and when receipt was demanded, the doctor told him that senior Dr. Sanjiv Verma shall issue the requisite receipt and prescription . He again told the complainant to visit the clinic on 4.8.2016 and in the meantime, the complainant enquired from his acquaintances and some other persons known to him and was told that Chandan Verma is not a qualified dentist, who has not even cleared the BDS course  and is just 10+2 pass out. Even Senior doctor Sanjiv Verma, who is father of Chandan Verma is also not a qualified doctor. Grandfather of Chandan Verma was ex-service man and retired from Military Hospital  and thereafter established the present clinic . Neither on the board of the clinic nor on the letter pad degree of Dr. Chandan Verma does not find mention. On 4.8.2016 complainant went to Jandiala Guru Town as was directed by Chandan Verma and a friend of the complainant made video from his mobile phone of Chandan Verma carrying out  treatment of the complainant . Again no receipt or prescription was given to the complainant. Rather a slip containing name of the medicine was issued, copy whereof is adduced on record.  Chandan Verma again stressed upon for teeth extraction to fix a denture but however the complainant told him that he shall come on some other day for the purpose. The diagnose made by Chandan Verma “so called doctor”  reveal that a denture has to be prepared and  in the meantime the teeth will be filled with silver after undergoing root canal. If the roots were in good conditions , then silver has to be filled in all the teeth. The complainant, who is an illiterate villager , was duped by the doctor, who took a sum of Rs. 3000/- from him  but did not issue any receipt  and told the complainant that doctor Sanjiv Verma shall issue the receipt which was never issued even after visiting the clinic in  number of times. Hence, this complaint.

2.       We have heard the complainant  on the question of admission of the complaint.

3.       The complainant has produced on record one prescription slip which is undated and even stamp of the clinic, is not legible thereon . Except this document complainant has not adduced on record any receipt regarding payment or treatment given to him by the opposite parties. On the basis of the bald allegations made in the complaint as well as the prescription slip, the complainant wants this Forum to issue the notice to the opposite parties for medical negligence in treating the complainant . If the opposite parties had not issued proper  prescription slip or receipt regarding the payment of medical expenses, the complainant could very well approach the Medical Council by lodging  the complaint against the opposite parties . The complainant could very well approach the Medical Council of Punjab as well as National Medical Council for ascertaining the degree(s) of the opposite parties, if he  nursed any doubt regarding that .The complainant has not adduced on record any such document . Even the so called video CD , has not been adduced on record for the reasons best known to him. Although the said Video CD was not admissible in evidence before this Forum  because this Forum follow summary procedure and no trial in the matter was admissible under law.  Since there is  nothing on record which connects, the opposite party with alleged medical negligence warranting this Forum to proceed further with the prosecution of the present complaint, therefore, instant complaint fails & is ordered to be dismissed in limine. Copy of the order be furnished to the complainant free of costs. File is ordered to be consigned to the record room.

Announced in Open Forum

Dated : 07.09.2016

/R/                                                                       

 

 

 

 
 
[ Sh. S.S.Panesar]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Anoop Lal Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.