West Bengal

StateCommission

A/29/2020

The Br.Manager, State Bank of India & Another - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. Minu Biswas - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Deblina Lahiri

30 Sep 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087
 
First Appeal No. A/29/2020
( Date of Filing : 14 Jan 2020 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/12/2019 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/34/2018 of District Kolkata-III(South))
 
1. The Br.Manager, State Bank of India & Another
Behala Br., 1168/1, Diamond Harbour Road, P.S.- Parnashree, Kolkata -700 034.
2. The General Manager, S.B.I
Local Head Office, Samriddhi Bhawan, 1, Strand Road, Kolkata -1
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Dr. Minu Biswas
W/o Pravat Kr. Singh, presently at 4, George Road, P.O. & P.S.- Naihati, Dist. North 24 Pgs., Pin -743 165.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Ms. Deblina Lahiri, Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Mr. Sabyasachi Santra., Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 30 Sep 2024
Final Order / Judgement

Hon’ble Mr. Ajeya Matilal, Presiding Member

Both sides are present through their respective Ld. Counsels.

Today is fixed for filing receipt showing payment of cost.

Appellant paid cost of Rs.1000/- to the Complainant/Respondent No.1 which is received by Respondent No.1.

Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the Order and Judgment dated 05.12.2019 passed by DCDRC, Unit-III in CC/34/2018 allowing the case on contest, the Appellant preferred this Appeal.

It appears from the Order that the Ld. Commission below directed the Opposite Parties to refund the maturity valued 18,421/- in respect of the certificate bearing A/C No.30276513742 within one month from the date of this Order and the Opposite Parties were further directed to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.10,000/- and 10,000/- towards litigation cost within above mentioned period in default, the entire amount shall carry interest @7% p.a.

Ld. Counsel for the Appellant submitted that the entire amount has been credited wrongly in favour of one Smt. Minu Biswas who should have been a necessary party before the Hon’ble DCDRC, Unit-III, since somehow C.I.F No.85786817844 of Dr. Minu Biswas became identical with C.I.F No. of Smt. Minu Biswas.

The fact is that the Smt. Minu Biswas was not a party to the proceeding before the Commission below.  So we are of the view that she is required to be added as a necessary party to the proceeding before the Commission below.

Under the circumstances, we are of the view that Smt. Minu Biswas should be added as she is needed as a necessary party before the Commission below.  The Commission below is directed to issue notices upon all necessary parties, including Ms. Minu Biswas to be added as Opposite Party No.3.

So, Appellant/Opposite Party is directed to take necessary steps before the Commission below for adding Smt. Minu Biswas a necessary Opposite Party in the category of Opposite Party No.3.

Appellant/Complainant shall also file amended necessary application there incorporating the name of Smt. Minu Biswas.

The Appellant and the Respondent of this Appeal shall remain present at Commission below on 26.11.2024 and shall dispose of the case preferably within 4 months from that date in accordance with law.

Let a copy of the order be supplied to all concerned free of costs.

Ordered accordingly.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. AJEYA MATILAL]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NITYASUNDAR TRIVEDI]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.