West Bengal

StateCommission

FA/560/2010

Sri Dharmaraj Harijan. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. Manik Chandra Nandi. - Opp.Party(s)

1. Mr. Kushal Sinha, 2. Mr. Sanat Sil.

14 Jun 2011

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
WEST BENGAL
BHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),
31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027
 
FA No: 560 Of 2010
(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/08/2010 in Case No. 25/2010 of District Bankura DF, Bankura)
 
1. Sri Dharmaraj Harijan.
Iddgamohalla, P.O., P.S. and Dist. Bankura(W.B.)
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Dr. Manik Chandra Nandi.
Proprietor of Manik Chandra Nursing Home, Pratapbagan, P.O., P.S. & Dist. Bankura(W.B.)
2. Dr. Ashoke Kumar Saha
B, M, C. H., Govindanagar, P.O., P.S. & Dist. Bankura(W.B.)
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER Member
 HON'BLE MR. SHANKAR COARI Member
 
For the Appellant:1. Mr. Kushal Sinha, 2. Mr. Sanat Sil., Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Ashoke Biswas. Mr. Padmanava Biswas., Advocate
 Mr. Ashoke Biswas. Mr. Padmanava Biswas., Advocate
ORDER

ORDER NO. 4 DT. 14.6.11

 

HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. P.K.SAMANTA, PRESIDENT

 

Appellant through Mr. Sanat Sil and Respondent through Mr. Ashoke Biswas along Mr. Padmanava Biswas, Ld. Advocates, are present.  Heard the Ld. Advocates.  Judgement is delivered as under :-

 

This Appeal is by the complainant against order dt. 27.8.10 passed by the Bankura District Consumer Forum in Proceeding Case No. 25 of 2010 whereby the complaint itself has been dismissed without admission of the same for adjudication on merits only on the ground that the complaint was not supported by expert evidence of medical negligence and further involves complicated questions as to medical negligence.  In view of the recent decisions of the Hon’ble National Commission as well as the Hon’ble Supreme Court the above impugned order cannot at all be sustained.  It has been clearly held that for the purpose of admission of a complaint in a medical negligence case, the prior expert opinion is not a must.   In view of the recent decisions as above we are unable to sustain the impugned order.  The same is set aside.  The Appeal is thus allowed.  The complaint case is sent back on remand to the Forum below for fresh trial on merits in accordance with law.  Since much time has passed in the meantime, it is expected that the above complaint case shall be disposed of as expeditiously as possible.

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SILPI MAJUMDER]
Member
 
[HON'BLE MR. SHANKAR COARI]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.