NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3022/2008

A.P. HOUSING BOARD & ORS - Complainant(s)

Versus

DR. K. KALYANI PRASAD - Opp.Party(s)

MR. MANOJ SAXENA

13 Jan 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 3022 OF 2008
 
(Against the Order dated 30/04/2007 in Appeal No. 682/2007 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)
1. A.P. HOUSING BOARD & ORS
2nd Floor, Gaganvihar, M.J. Road
Hyderabad
ANDHRA PRADESH
2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (HG)
Central Division, A.P. Housing Board, 2nd Floor, Gagan Vihar, M.J. Road
Hyderabad - 500 001
ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF (OSD)
Singapore Township (Sanskruti Township), Pocharam
R.R.
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. DR. K. KALYANI PRASAD
Resident of D/o. K.B.R. Prasad, 404, Gokul Krishna Apartments, Yellareddyguda
HYDERABAD - 500 073
ANDHRA PRADESH
2. DR. K. KALYANI PRASAD
Presently Residing at 404, Gokul Krishna Apartments, Near State Home, Yellareddyguda
Hyderabad - 500 073
ANDHRA PRADESH
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA, PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. VINAY KUMAR, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 13 Jan 2011
ORDER

Delay in filing review application, which is 58 days, is condoned. This application has been placed before us by circulation in terms of Regulation 15 (2) of the Consumer Protection Regulations, 2005. The review is sought on the basis of averments made in para 4 of the review application and the grounds specified after paragraph 6 of the application. The review is sought, inter alia, on the ground that it is not a case of deficiency on the part of petitioner; that the matter pertains purely to a contract, which was cancelled and the Consumer Forum has no jurisdiction and that the order of the Commission is contrary to the Specific Relief Act. We are afraid that none of these grounds can be considered in a review application as the challenge for review is on the merits of the matter, which has already been decided by order, which is sought to be reviewed. It is now well settled that review in not an appeal in disguise. We do not find any ground for review sought by the petitioner and the review application is hereby dismissed with no order as to cost.

 
......................J
R.K. BATTA
PRESIDING MEMBER
......................
VINAY KUMAR
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.