Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/30/2014

S. JAGADEESWARI - Complainant(s)

Versus

DR. G. SUNDARAMURTHY - Opp.Party(s)

T.K. RAVIKUMAR

21 Oct 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                    BEFORE     Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::    PRESIDENT                       

                                           Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::   MEMBER

 

 

CC. No. 30/2014

 

                                                            DATED THIS THE 21^st  DAY OF OCTOBER 2022

 

S.Jagadeeswari, W/o D.Sivakumar,

Aged about 33 years,

Navin Vignesh Apartments

No.76, Medavakkam Main Road,

Chennai – 91                                                        ..Complainant

                                              Vs

 

1.Dr. G.Sundaramurthy,

G.S.Clinic,

GA 1, Vinayaga Flats,

New No. 36, old No.49,

East Mada street,

Thiruvanmiyur,

Chennai – 41

 

2. Bharath Speciality Labs,

Represented  by its Director,

197, Peters Road,

Royapettah,

Chennai – 14   

 

3. Mr.Suresh Kumar,

M/s Vijaya Hospital,

Old No. 180, New No.434,

N.S.K. Salai,

Vadapalani 

Chennai – 600 026                                             ..Opposite parties 1 to 3

 

Counsel for the complainant                   : M/s T.K.Ravikumar

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 & 3     : Dr.B.Cheran

2^nd opposite party                                 : Exparte

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                

                                                Docket order

 

          No representation for complainant.  Opposite parties 1 and 3 present. This complaint is posted today for appearance of complainant and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M,  the complainant was not present  hence,  passed over and  called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.   The complaint is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                                Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                 R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT