Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/241/2012

Susaimary Kaspar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. Chandrika Manimaran, C.M. Hospital & 3 Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

K. Kumaran,

30 Aug 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. S. KARUPPIAH                                             JUDICIAL MEMBER

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                          MEMBER

 

F.A. No.241/2012

 

(Against the Order dt.30.03.2011 made in C.C. No.83/2004 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Chengalpattu.)

DATED THE 30^TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022

 

 

Susaimary Kaspar,

W/o. Mr. J. Kaspar,

No.21, Ottery Salai,

Puzuthivakkam,

Chennai – 600 091.                                                            .. Appellant / Complainant.

 

-Versus-

 

1. Dr. Chandrika Manimaran,

C/o. C.M. Hospital,

No.1, 47^th Street,

5^th Main Road,

Nanganallur,

Chennai – 600 061.

 

2. Dr. S. Varadarajan,

No.63, Defense Colony,

Chennai – 600 097.                                                         

 

3. Dr. Hariharan’s Diabetes and Heart Care Hospital Pvt. Ltd.,

Nos.24 & 26, 29^th Street,

Nanganallur,

Chennai – 600 061.

 

4. M/s. Karthick Pharmacy,

Nos.24 & 26, 29^th Street,

Nanganallur,

Chennai – 600 061.                                                  .. Respondents / Opposite parties.

 

 

Counsel for Appellant / Complainant                         : M/s. K. Kumaran

Counsel for 1^st Respondent / 1^st Opposite party        : Dr. B. Cheran

Counsel for 2^nd Respondent / 2^nd Opposite party      : M/s. Shivakumar & Suresh

 Respondents 3 & 4 / Opposite parties  3 & 4           : Served and called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 30.08.2022 for reporting settlement and for filing Joint Memo of Compromise or for arguments (in list) and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

Appellant/ complainant and the 2^nd respondent/ 2^nd opposite party present.   No representation for the 1^st respondent/1^st opposite party.

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the appellant/ complainant and the 2^nd respondent/ 2^nd opposite party represented that the matter has been settled amicably between the parties and also a Joint Memorandum of Compromise has been filed to that effect.  Joint Memorandum of Compromise was recorded.

 

          In view of the Joint Memorandum of Compromise, this appeal is disposed off.  The Joint Memorandum of Compromise shall form part of the order.   No costs.

 

 

 

                       Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                            Sd/-

R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                S. KARUPPIAH                               R.SUBBIAH

            MEMBER                             JUDICIAL MEMBER                           PRESIDENT