Uttarakhand

StateCommission

A/204/2019

Branch Manager, T.C.I., ( Transport Corporation of Inadi Friegh) - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dr. Avinash Virmani - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Kunal Dey

31 May 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
23/16, Circular Road, Dalanwala, Dehradun, Uttarakhand 248001
Dehradun-248001
Final Order
 
First Appeal No. A/204/2019
( Date of Filing : 23 May 2019 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 08/01/2019 in Case No. 142/2015 of District Haridwar)
 
1. Branch Manager, T.C.I., ( Transport Corporation of Inadi Friegh)
Transport House, Opp. Khoobsurant Place, Khanna Nagar, Haridwar Road, Jawalpur, Po. Haridwar,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
2. General Manager,Transport Corporation of India Ltd
Plot No. 306-307, 1-8,271-273, third floor, Ashoka Bhopal Chambers, SP Raod, Secundrabad
3. Managing Director,Transport Corporation of India Ltd.
Corporate office at TCI House, Plot No. 69, Industrial area ,Sector-32,
Gurgaon
Haryana
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Dr. Avinash Virmani
s/o late Chandrabhan Virmani (Director), Zaneka Health Care Pvt. BHEL, Ancillery Estate, Ranipur,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
2. Regional Manager, The New India Assurance Company Ltd.
Ranipur More,
Haridwar
Uttarakhand
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 31 May 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Case is called out.

Sh. Anand Chamoli, learned counsel for the appellants; Sh. Manoj Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and Sh. Rajesh Kumar Devliyal, learned counsel for respondent No. 2, are present.

Sh. Ramagya Singh, Branch Head, T.C.I.F., on behalf of the appellants and Dr. Avinash Virmani – respondent     No. 1 / complainant, are also present in person.

A Compromise Deed has been filed on behalf of the parties, stating therein that the matter has been compromised between the appellants and respondent     No. 1, on payment of sum of Rs. 55,000/- by the appellants to respondent No. 1.

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the appellants and respondent No. 1 have settled the dispute through compromise, hence the appeal should be decided in terms of compromise. 

The Compromise Deed has been verified by learned counsel for the parties.

 

Order

 

Accordingly, the appeal is decided in terms of the compromise, which shall form part of the order.

The amount deposited by the appellants with this Commission, be released in their favour.

Let the record be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.S. Tripathi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Udai Singh Tolia]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.