Chandigarh

DF-II

MA/240/2023

ANKUR MALHOTRA - Complainant(s)

Versus

DR KANWARJIT SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

MANOJ LAKHOTIA

08 Dec 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II

U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

 

M.A. No.240/2023 In C.C. No.672/2020
Date of Institution	:	06.12.2023
Date of Decision	:	08.12.2023

 

                     

            

 

            

 

 

Ankur Malhotra

    ...  Applicant/Complainant.

 

Versus

Dr.Kanwarjit Singh Dhillon & Others

…. Opposite Parties

 

BEFORE:
	SHRI AMRINDER SINGH SIDHU,	PRESIDENT
	SHRI B.M.SHARMA	MEMBER
Present:-
	Sh.Manoj Lakhotia, Adv. along with the applicant-complainant

   

ORDER BY AMRINDER SINGH SIDHU, M.A.(Eng.),LLM,PRESIDENT

1.     The present misc. application has been filed by the applicant-complainant with a request for affording an opportunity of personal hearing before pronouncement of the order and to permit him to place on record some documents of medical treatment being taken by him. 
2.     In the application, the applicant-complainant has alleged that the above titled case has been taken up on 28.11.2023 and the matter has been argued and now the case is reserved for orders. The applicant-complainant has placed on record the status of the complaint as available on the website as Annexure A-1. The applicant-complainant has further stated in the application that he was away to USA for treatment of the illness caused by the OPs and he is still taking the treatment.  He has further stated that the hospital/doctors have provided certain documents, which may be useful for the proper adjudication of the case with regard to the medical treatment.
3.     We have heard the Counsel along with applicant/ complainant and have gone through the case file and the documents on record.
4.     It is observed that the Learned Members have reserved the complaint for order vide order dated 28.11.2023, which reads as under:-

“DISTRICT Consumer Disputes Redressal COMMISSION-II, U.T., Chandigarh

CC/672/2020

Ankur Malhotra Vs.  Dr. Kanwarjit Singh Dhillon

QUORUM:-           HON’BLE  MR. S.K SARDANA,    PRESIDING MEMBER           HON’BLE  MR. B. M. SHARMA,                      MEMBER

PRESENT:

Sh. Ishneet Bhatia, Adv, proxy for Sh.  Manoj Lakhotia, Counsel for the Complainant. Sh. Devinder Kumar, Counsel for OP No. 1 along with Sh. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate. Sh. Ankush Aggarwal, Counsel for OP No. 2.

Dated  28th   day  of  NOVEMBER,  2023.

ORDER

 

                    Today fresh vakalatnama of Sh. Ankush Aggarwal, Adovcate has been filed on behalf of OP No. 2.

                   Arguments heard. Reserved for order.

                   Parties are directed to file written arguments within 3 days. 

 

Sd/-

 [S.K SARDANA]

PRESIDING MEMBER

 

Sd/-

[B.M.SHARMA]

MEMBER “

 

5.     Since the orders have already been pronounced by the Learned Members on 06.12.2023, therefore, the present misc. application filed by the applicant-complainant has become infructuous and the only remedy available with the applicant-complainant is to prefer an appeal against the order dated 06.12.2023 before the appropriate authority as per law.
6.     In view of the above discussion, the present application is dismissed having become infructuous.
7.     Certified copy of this order be sent to the parties, as per rules. After compliance file be consigned to record room.

Announced in open Commission 08/12/2023
	Sd/- (AMRINDER SINGH SIDHU) PRESIDENT
	Sd/- (B.M.SHARMA) MEMBER