Chandigarh

StateCommission

CC/358/2016

Nitin Goyal - Complainant(s)

Versus

DLF Universal Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sunil K. Dixit Adv.

26 Sep 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

 

 

Complaint case No.	:	358 of 2016
Date of Institution	:	18.07.2016
Date of Decision	:	26.09.2016

 

1. Sh. Nitin Goyal, Aged 40 years.
2. Sh. Nishant Goyal, Aged 36 years,

Both resident of House No.329, Phase-I, Urban Estate, Patiala.

…… Complainants.

Versus

 

1. DLF Universal Limited, SCO No.190-192, Sector 8C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Signatory.
2. DLF Universal Ltd., Regd. Office Shopping Mall, 3^rd Floor, Arjun Marg, DLF City, Phase-I, Gurgaon, Haryana – 122002.

....Opposite Parties.

 

Complaints under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

 

BEFORE:     JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT.

                   MR. DEV RAJ, MEMBER.

                   MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER.

 

Argued by:- Sh. Devinder Kumar, Advocate for the complainants.

                   Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Advocate for the Opposite Parties.

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

            Vide our detailed order of the even date, recorded separately in Consumer Complaint No.344 of 2016 titled as ‘Raj Kumar Lekhwani Vs. DLF Universal Ld. & Anr.’, this complaint has been partly accepted, with costs.

2.           Certified copy of the main order, passed in Consumer Complaint No.344 of 2016 titled as ‘Raj Kumar Lekhwani Vs. DLF Universal Ld. & Anr.’, be placed on this file also.

3.           Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge.

Pronounced.

26.09.2016.

[JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 [DEV RAJ]

MEMBER

 

 

 

[PADMA PANDEY]

 MEMBER

Ad