Complaint presented on:  18.09.2015

                                                                          Order pronounced on:   03.10.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

      2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

       PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L., PRESIDENT

                    THIRU. M.UYIRROLI KANNAN B.B.A., B.L.,      MEMBER – I 

 

TUESDAY THE 03rd  DAY OF OCTOBER 2017

                                      C.C.NO.04/2016

 

Mr.Rajesh Jose,

Flat No.031; 3rd Floor,

Tower No.41: DLF Garden City,

Thazhambur – PO,

Tirupporur Taluk,

Kancheepuram District,

Chennai – 600 130.

                                                                                     ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

1.The Managing Director,

DLF Southern Homes Private Limited,

P-39 New Delhi South Extension,

New Delhi – 110 049. (Notice to be served on Regd. Office)

 

2. The Regional Manager,

DLF Southern Homes Private Limited,

Old No.828, New No. 268: Poonamallee High Road,

Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

 

 

                                                                             …..Opposite parties

 

 

 

 

                                                   

Date of complaint                   : 02.02.2016

Counsel for complainant                     :M/s. K.Murugan & N.Vidhyasagar

 

Counsel for  opposite parties          : M/s. Aiyar & Dolia 

 

O R D E R

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

Counsel for the opposite party present. No representation for the complainant. The complaint was posted for filing the proof affidavit of the complainant 1st time on 28.06.2016. From that hearing the case was adjourned for 15 hearings for filing the proof affidavit of the complainant. He has not filed the same. Lastly from 13.09.2017 hearing today (03.10.2017) adjourned as last chance to file the proof affidavit of the complainant. However, there was no representation on behalf of the complainant till 04.00 p.m and also not filed his proof affidavit. The complainant also called absent.

The attitude of the complainant above shows that non filing of the proof affidavit that he has no interest in prosecuting the complaint. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No costs.

        Pronounced by us on this 03rd  day of October 2017.

 

      -sd-        -sd-

MEMBER – I PRESIDENT