Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/05/2016

M/s.Bhanumathy Chakrapani - Complainant(s)

Versus

DLF Southern Homes P Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

K.Murugan and N.Vidya sagar

03 Oct 2017

ORDER

                                                                       Complaint presented on:  22.09.2015

                                                                          Order pronounced on:   03.10.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

      2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

       PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,         PRESIDENT

                    THIRU. M.UYIRROLI KANNAN B.B.A., B.L.,      MEMBER – I

 

TUESDAY THE 03^rd  DAY OF OCTOBER 2017

                                      C.C.NO.05/2016

 

1.Mrs.Bhanumathy Chakrapani,

2.Mr.Chakrapani Rudraraju,

 

Both residing at:

Flat No:3 15^th Floor: Tower No.8 DLF,

Garden City, Thazhambur – PO,

Tirupporur Taluk Kancheepuram District,

Chennai – 600 130.

 

                                                                                     ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

1.The Managing Director,

DLF Southern Homes Private Limited,

P-39 New Delhi South Extension,

New Delhi – 110 049.

 

2. The Regional Manager,

DLF Southern Homes Private Limited,

Old No.828, New No. 268: Poonamallee High Road,

Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

 

 

                                                                             …..Opposite parties

 

 

                                                         

Date of complaint                                              : 02.02.2016

Counsel for complainant                           :M/s. K.Murugan & N.Vidhyasagar

 

Counsel for  opposite parties                    : M/s. Aiyar & Dolia

 

O R D E R

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

          Counsel for the opposite party present. No representation for the complainant. The complaint was posted for filing the proof affidavit of the complainant 1^st time on 28.06.2016. From that hearing the case was adjourned for 15 hearings for filing the proof affidavit of the complainant. He has not filed the same. Lastly from 13.09.2017 hearing today (03.10.2017 adjourned as last chance to file the proof affidavit of the complainant. However, there was no representation on behalf of the complainant till 04.00 p.m and also not filed his proof affidavit. The complainant also called absent.

          The attitude of the complainant above shows that non filing of the proof affidavit that he has no interest in prosecuting the complaint. Hence the complaint is dismissed for default. No costs.

                        Pronounced by us on this 03^rd  day of October 2017.

 

      -sd-                                                                                 -sd-     

MEMBER – I                                                                PRESIDENT