Chandigarh

StateCommission

CC/356/2016

Anil Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Rakesh Dhiman, Adv.

10 Nov 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T., CHANDIGARH

Consumer Complaint	:	356 of 2016
Date of Institution	:	15.07.2016
Date of Decision	:	10.11.2016

 

Anil Kumar son of Sh. Raj Singh, resident of Village Kakana Bhadri, Tehsil Gohana, District Sonepat, Haryana.

 

                                            .........Complainant.

Versus

DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO No.190-191, Sector 8-C, Chandigarh through its Managing Director/Authorized Signatory.

 

..........Opposite party.

 

Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE: JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.), PRESIDENT.

MR. DEV RAJ, MEMBER

            MRS. PADMA PANDEY, MEMBER.

 

Argued by:

 

Sh. Rakesh Dhiman, Advocate for the complainant.

Ms. Ekta Jhanji, Sh. Parveen Jain and Sh. Arjun Sharma, Advocates for the Opposite Party.

 

PER DEV RAJ, MEMBER

            Vide our detailed order of the even date, recorded separately in Consumer Complaint No.374 of 2016 titled as ‘Anupama Vs. M/s DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.’, this complaint has been partly accepted, with costs.

2.           Certified copy of the main order, passed in Consumer Complaint No.374 of 2016 titled as ‘Anupama Vs. M/s DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.’, be placed on this file also.

3.           Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge.

Pronounced.

10.11.2016.

[JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH (RETD.)]

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

 [DEV RAJ]

MEMBER

 

 

 

[PADMA PANDEY]

 MEMBER

Ad