Chandigarh

DF-II

CC/573/2012

Subhadra Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

DLF Homes, Panchkula, Pvt. Limited, - Opp.Party(s)

Vivek Deep

28 Mar 2013

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 573 of 2012
1. Subhadra Sharmaaged about 75 years wife of shri Om Parkash Sharma, resident of House No. 1101, Sector 15-D, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. DLF Homes, Panchkula, Pvt. Limited, Shop No. 101-102, DLF City Centre, IT Park, Krishan garh, Chandigarh through its Executive Director/ authorized representative. 2. Mahesh Gupta S/o Sh. Y.P.Gupta, R/o House No. 1095, Sector -15-B, Chandigarh. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :Vivek Deep , Advocate for
For the Respondent :

Dated : 28 Mar 2013
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Consumer Complaint No.573 of 2012

 

Subhadra Sharma   Vs.      DLF Homes & anr.

 

PRESENT:

 

Sh.Vivek Deep, Counsel for Complainant.

Sh.Neeraj Sharma, Proxy counsel for Ms.Ekta Jhanji, Counsel for OP No.1.

Sh.Pankaj Chandgothia, Counsel for OP No.2.

 

 

Dated the 28th day of March, 2013

 

ORDER

 

            Sh.Vivek Deep, Counsel for Complainant, has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“Due to technical defect, I do not press this complaint at this stage. It be dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant reserves her right to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect.”

 

 

            In view of the said statement of counsel for complainant, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh complaint on the same cause of action after removal of the technical defect, as per law.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

 

                        Sd/-                                                                  Sd/-

            (MADHU MUTNEJA)                                           (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           

                        MEMBER                                                          PRESIDENT

 


MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT ,