Haryana

StateCommission

CC/49/2022

ANURADHA RAKSHIT - Complainant(s)

Versus

DLF HOME DEVELOPERS LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

ROHIT KAUSHIK

27 Aug 2024

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                         

                                                          Date of Institution: 01.08.2022

                                                          Date of final hearing:27.08.2024

                                                          Date of Pronouncement: 27.08.2024

 

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO.49 OF 2022

 

Ms. Anuradha Rakshit D/o Late Shri R.C. Rakshit, aged 62 years, R/o 27 Panchratan Apartments, 7/128, Swarup Nagar, Kanpur (U.P.)-208002.

 

 

                                      ….Complainant

Versus

 

 

1. The Director, DLF Home Developers Ltd, DLF Centre, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110001.
2. The Managing Director, DLF Corporate Office, Ground Floor, DLF Gateway Tower, Cyber City, R-Block, DLF City Phase-III, Gurugram-122001, Haryana.
3. The President, Express Greens M1 Condominium Association, Express Greens, Sector M-1, Manesar, Gurugram-122005.
4. Chairman-HSIIDC, C-13 & 14, Sector-6, Panchkula-134109, Haryana.
5. The Estate Manager-HSIIDC, IMT Manesar, Near Tehsil Building, Gurgaon-122050.

 

....OppositeParties

 

         

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President

                   MR. S.P. SOOD, JUDICIAL MEMBER

                   Ms. MANJULA, MEMBER

                  

 

Present:     Shri Rohit Kaushik, counsel for the complainant.

                   Ms. Rupali Shekhar Verma, counsel for opposite parties No.1 and 2.

                   Shri Ankit Kumar, proxy counsel for Shri Tarun Gupta, counsel for opposite parties No.4 and 5.

                   Opposite party No.3 is proforma party and therefor not required to be present.

 

 

 

 

PER: T.P.S. MANN, J.

 

ORDER

 

 

1. Counsel for the complainant states that the matter has since been settled amicably and under these circumstances, the complainant may be permitted to withdraw the complaint.
2. Counsel appearing for the opposite parties No.1 and 2 as well as proxy counsel for opposite parties No.4 and 5 states that they have no objection, if the complainants are allowed to withdraw the complaint.
3. In view of the above, the complaint is hereby disposed of as having been withdrawn.
4. Application(s) pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order.
5. A copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the law. The order be uploaded forthwith on the website of the Commission for the perusal of the parties.
6. File be consigned to record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

 

(T.P.S. MANN)

PRESIDENT

 

 

 

(S.P. SOOD)

JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

 

 

 

(MANJULA)

MEMBER 

Pronounced On: 27.08.2024

MS