IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated, the 28^th day of December,  2023

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

C C No. 298/2023  (Filed on 19/09/2023)

Complainant                    :         Sethu Nath S.

                                                          Puthiyakatil House,

                                                          Udayanapuram P.O.

                                                          Vaikom, Nerekadavu

                                                                             Vs.   

Opposite parties                       : (1)    DIZO

                                                          Dizo Innovation Private Ltd.

                                                          C-84, Sector -33, Noida,

                                                          Gautam Buddha nagar,

                                                          Uttar Pradesh – 201301

                                                  (2)   Flipkart Internet Private Ltd.

                                                          Vaishnavi Summit,

                                                          Ground Floor, 7^th Main,

80 Feet Road, 3^rd Block,

Koramangala Industrial

Layout, Bangalore

                                                 (3)    Tech Connect Private Ltd.

                                                          NDR Warehousing Pvt. Ltd.

SFNo.525, 526,529- 533,

Okolipalayam Road, Othyakalmandapam,

                                                          Coimbatore, Tamilnadu

O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration. After hearing the matter the Commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  After admitting the complaint the case was posted for the production of the copy of the complaint and the documents which are to be sent to the opposite party.  Since 10-10-23 this case was posted for the production of the copy of the complaint and the documents which are to be sent to the opposite parties. When the case came up for consideration today, it is noticed that the complainant was continuously absent since 10-10-23 and not produced the copy of the complaint and the documents which are to be sent to the opposite parties, inspite of giving sufficient opportunities for the same.  In the above circumstances we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.  In view of the above discussion we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed for default.

 In the result the complaint is dismissed.  There will be no order as to cost.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 28^th day of December, 2023

Sri. Manulal V.S. President                       Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                           Sd/-

                                                                                                By Order

                                                                                   Assistant Registrar