Karnataka

StateCommission

A/783/2014

Vasantrao S/o. Satyanarayana - Complainant(s)

Versus

Divisional Manager, United India - Opp.Party(s)

N.P. Singri

02 Aug 2021

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
First Appeal No. A/783/2014
( Date of Filing : 18 Jun 2014 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/04/2014 in Case No. CC/191/2013 of District Dharwad)
 
1. Vasantrao S/o. Satyanarayana
R/o. Bandiharlapur, Tq. & Dist. Koppal .
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Divisional Manager, United India
Insurance Co. Ltd., Joshi Building, 1st Floor, Lamington Road, Hubli Dist. Dharwad 580028.
2. The Manager, Syndicate Bank
Bandiharlapur Village, Tq. & Dist. Koppal .
3. The Manager, TTK Health Care Service Ltd
3rd Floor, D-Block, Revankar Complex, Near Court Circle, Hubli Dist. Dharwad 580029 .
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 02 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

Basava Bhavan, Sri Basaveswara Circle, High grounds, Bangalore-560001.

 

Case No. - A/783/2014

 


Appellant/s

1 . Vasantrao S/o. Satyanarayana .
R/o. Bandiharlapur, Tq. & Dist. Koppal .
(By N.P. Singri)

-Versus-

Respondent/s

1 . Divisional Manager, United India .
Insurance Co. Ltd., Joshi Building, 1st Floor, Lamington Road, Hubli Dist. Dharwad 580028.
(By B.C.S)

2 . The Manager, Syndicate Bank
Bandiharlapur Village, Tq. & Dist. Koppal .

3 . The Manager, TTK Health Care Service Ltd
3rd Floor, D-Block, Revankar Complex, Near Court Circle, Hubli Dist. Dharwad 580029 .

02.08.2021

ORDER

Mr. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER

1.        The appellant/complainant filed this appeal way back in the year 2014 being aggrieved by the Order dt.16.04.2014 passed in CC.No.191/2013 on the file of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dharwad wherein the District Commission has partly allowed the complaint which directed the Opposite Party Nos. 1 & 3 jointly and severally to pay a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- to the complainant along with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of complaint, till realization.  Further directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,000/- as compensation and Rs.500/- as cost of the proceedings and granted 4 weeks time to comply the abovesaid order.  The claim against Opposite Party No.2 is dismissed.

2.        The appellant not appeared before this Commission inspite of giving sufficient opportunities to address his arguments and to convince how the impugned order passed by the District Commission is not satisfactory and against to law. 

3.        The case called twice, appellant not present.

4.        We have perused the appeal memo.  Mere memorandum of appeal is not sufficient to hold the appeal in the absence of any arguments and convincement by the appellant.  As such, the appeal requires to be dismissed.  Accordingly, appeal is dismissed.

Forward free copies to both parties.

 

          Sd/-                                                            Sd/-

MEMBER                                                      JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

KCS*

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ravishankar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.Sunita Channabasappa Bagewadi]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.