Delhi

West Delhi

CC/14/400

Ashu Tyagi - Complainant(s)

Versus

Divine Autotech Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

04 Aug 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-III: WEST

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI

NEW DELHI

 

Complaint Case No. 400/2014

 

IN THE MATTER OF:

 

MS ASHU TYAGI

H. NO. 50, BLOCK -1

UTTAM NAGAR, NEW DELHI – 110059                                                           COMPLAINANT

 

                                                            VERSUS

 

1. DIVINE AUTOTECH PVT LTD

B-40/70, NAJAFGARH ROAD

OPP. MOTI NAGAR POLICE STATION

NEW DELHI – 110015 …..OPPOSITE PARTY 1

 

2. RENAULT INDIA PVT LTD

ASV RAMANA TOWERS, H-37-38

FOURTH FLOOR, VENKATANAROYANG ROAD

T. NAGAR, CHENNAI – 600017 (T.N.)……OPPOSITE PARTY 2

 

 

CORAM :-

 

MS SONICA MEHROTRA, PRESIDENT

MS RICHA JINDAL, MEMBER

MR ANIL KUMAR KOUSHAL, MEMBER

 

DATE OF INSTITUTION:    JUDGMENT RESERVED ON:           DATE OF DECISION:

26.06.2014 04.08.2023 04.08.2023

Present:    Complainant in person                            

                None for OPs

                            

ORDER

 

Announced in Open Court
 

Order passed by Ms Richa Jindal, Member

 

         

1. Today Complainant informed to this bench that the complainant has already sold his car in question 3 months ago and further requested for dismissal of complaint.

 

2. However, we are of the view that in view of the above revelation on the part of the Complainant and proven on record, no cause of action survives in the complaint. In this regard we are guided by the judgment of the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in the case of M/S. Honda Cars India Ltd. vs Jatinder Singh Madan, (Revision Petition NO.2622/2012, decided on 11 October, 2013) wherein  it was held that since the complainant has sold the vehicle, the complaint is rendered infructuous as the complainant is no more a ‘consumer’.  This position has been reiterated by the Hon’ble NCDRC in the case of  Ramesh Vs. Skoda Auto India P. Ltd & ORs, 2019 SCC Online NCDRC 465.  

 

 

3. In view of the aforementioned rulings, the complaint is dismissed as infructuous.

 

 

4. Let a copy of this order be given to each party free of cost after receiving the application for the certified copy as per the direction received from the Hon’ble State Commission.

 

5. File be consigned to the record room after the pronouncement of the order.

 

6. Announced on­ 04.08.2023. 

 

 

 

 

(Richa Jindal)         (Anil Kumar Koushal)                                      (Sonica Mehrotra)            

 Member                          Member                                                      President