Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/14/355

A S Neelambika - Complainant(s)

Versus

District Zonal office,Idea Cellular - Opp.Party(s)

29 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

                           SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN         : PRESIDENT

                           SMT.PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

                           SRI.VIJU.V.R                       : MEMBER

 

CC.NO.355/14 (Filed on : 26/05/2014)

ORDER DATED : 29/11/2022

 

COMPLAINANT

          A.S.Neelambika,

          D/o.Ayyappan Nair,

          Residing at Sowparnika,

          TC.2/1993/9, Pattom Palace.P.O

          Thiruvananthapuram

          Pin code – 695 004

(By Adv.G.S.Kalkura & Adv.Selvi.M)

 

VS

OPPOSITE PARTIES

1. The District Zonal Officer,

IDEA Cellular (Services), Sreekariyam.P.O

•  

 

2. The Manager (Services),

IDEA Cellular Services,

•  
•  

 

(By Adv.V.S.Sunil kumar & Adv.T.L.Sreeram)

 

                                                   ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN      : PRESIDENT

1. This complaint is filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

2.  This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint, notice was issued on the opposite parties. The opposite parties entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegations raised by the complainant. Since 12/07/2019 this case is adjourned for filing affidavit of the complainant. On 14/09/2022, the counsel appearing for the complainant reported no instruction from the complainant. Hence this Commission issued a notice to the complainant on 25/10/2022 to appear before this Commission to further proceed with this complaint. The notice issued to the complainant was returned with endorsement “addressee deceased”. Hence the case was posted to this day for giving a chance to the legal heirs of deceased original complainant to appear and further proceed with this complaint. When the case came up for consideration today no legal representatives of the original deceased complainant was entered appearance to further proceed with this complaint. In the above circumstances, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as abated.

             In the result, complaint is dismissed as abated. There will be no order as to costs.

              A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

 

     Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 29^th day of November 2022.

 

                                                                                               Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                       Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

 

                                                                                           Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

 

 

be/