CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD
Dated this the 24th day of February 2016
PRESENT : SMT. SHINY.P.R, PRESIDENT Date of filing: 16/02/2016
: SMT. SUMA K.P, MEMBER
CC/19/2016
M.C.Rugmini, : Complainant
Vallath House, Thekkeparambu,
Puduppariyaram, Palakkad-678 731
(By Adv.A.K.Joseph)
Vs
1. District Collector, : Opposite parties
Collectorate, Palakkad.
2. General Manager,
District Industrial Centre, Palakkad.
O R D E R
By Smt. Shiny. P.R, President
Complainant alleged deficiency in service on the part opposite parties in executing the order of the Forum. Complainant submitted that 1st opposite party stayed the Revenue Recovery proceedings initiated against 2nd opposite party. According to complainant 1st opposite party has no right to stay the proceedings of the Forum. Due to the acts on opposite party complainant has caused mental agony and financial loss. Hence the complaint.
Heard on admission. We have perused the complaint and documents filed before the Forum. On verification it is found that complainant did not avail any service from 1st opposite party. 1st opposite party did not receive any consideration from complainant and they discharged only statutory functions. There is no consumer relationship between the complainant and Opposite party. Hence the alleged dispute cannot be treated as a consumer dispute. In the above circumstances we are of the view that complaint is not maintainable. Hence we dismiss the complaint without going to the merits of the case.
Complainant can approach appropriate authority for the redressal of grievance.
Pronounced in the open court on this the 24th day of February, 2016.
Sd/-
Shiny. P.R
President
Sd/-
Suma. K.P
Member
