Factual backgrounds are that petitioner made deposit of Rs.10,000/- in a scheme with respondent- Bank on 13.04.99 for a period of ten years which carried interest @ 13% p.a. on deposit on maturity on 13.04.2009 after petitioner approached Bank he got maturity value of Rs.23,000/- on 24.4.2009. However, consumer complaint was filed by petitioner alleging that he had made deposit with Bank in the scheme on assurance of Bank that maturity value of deposit would be Rs.35,942/-. Claim was resisted by respondent-Bank. However, District Forum on evaluation of pleadings of the parties, directed Bank to pay residual amount of Rs.12,942/-. Compensation of Rs.2,000/-was also awarded. Aforesaid finding of District Forum was, however, reversed by State Commission in appeal holding that in Banks different deposit schemes carry different rate of interest payable to customer and compound interest is paid only in case of cash deposit. No fault can be found with Bank simply on bald submission of petitioner that Bank had assured otherwise and had not rendered proper service to petitioner. I find no infirmity with the finding of State Commission even on merit. Revision petition is resultantly dismissed. However no order as to costs.