Heard the complainant who is in person regarding admission of the complaint.<br /> <br /> He has come up with this complaint with the grievance that Op has not provided car parking facility along with flat sold to him and therefore, for a direction to Op to provide him separate car parking slot. As seen from the copy of the sale deed produced by the complainant, Op found to have delivered possession of the flat along with one open car parking slot under the registered sale deed. Thereafter it is proved that earmarked car parking slot, possession was delivered to the complainant. Complainant cannot now after lapse of about four years complain that he was not given the car parking slot. With this, the relationship of the consumers and service provider, in our view has ceased. Even otherwise if the complainant had not been given possession of the car parking area as agreed, he should have filed the complaint within two years from the year 2006 but has not done so, but has come after lapse of 4 years. As such, complaint is barred by limitation is liable to be dismissed on the grounds as stated above.<br /> <br /> For the above reason, complaint is dismissed at the stage of admission.<br />