Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/500/2010

Surjit Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Director General Transport - Opp.Party(s)

27 Aug 2010

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 500 of 2010
1. Surjit Kumarson of Satpal age 26 Yrs R/o Village Garhi Kotaha Tehsil and District Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Director General TransportHaryana 30 Bays Bldg. Sector-17 Chandigarh2. General ManagerHaryana Roadways Yamuna Nagar ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 27 Aug 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

 

                                                                                   

                                                            Complaint Case No. 500 of 2010

 

 

Surjeet Kumar son of Sh.Satpal, age 26 years, resident of Village Garhi Kotaha, Tehsil and District Panchkula.

                                                                                                            –    Complainant

 

                                                Versus

 

1.         Director, General Transport, Haryana 30 Bays Building, Sector 17, Chandigarh.

2.         General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Yamuna Nagar.

                                                                                                            - Opposite Parties

 

Present:         Ms.Sonia Saini, Advocate for Complainant.

 

                                                           

Dated, the 27th day of August, 2010.

                                                            ORDER

 

                        The learned counsel for complainant has made statement that she may kindly be allowed to withdraw the present complaint with liberty to file fresh before the appropriate Forum having territorial jurisdiction. Accordingly, the complaint is allowed to be withdrawn without prejudice to the right of the complainant to file fresh before the appropriate Forum having territorial jursidcition, subject to law of limitation.

                        Copy of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING OFFICER

            LOK ADALAT.

 

 

 

                                    2nd MEMBER                                     1st MEMBER



MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, MEMBERHONABLE MR. JAGROOP SINGH MAHAL, PRESIDENT ,