Kerala

Kollam

CC/108/2019

Thulaseedharan Nair, - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dileep, - Opp.Party(s)

20 Sep 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum
Civil Station , Kollam-691013.
 
Complaint Case No. CC/108/2019
( Date of Filing : 09 May 2019 )
 
1. Thulaseedharan Nair,
Sreekrishnalayam,Melila.P.O,Kunnicode.
2. K.L.Anilkumar,
Anu Mandiram, Vallam,Kottarakkara.P.O.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Dileep,
Upasana,Thadimillinu Thekkubhagom,Chethady,Chengamanadu.P.O,Kunnicode.
2. Prasanna,
W/o.Dileep,Upasana,Thadimillinu Thekkubhagom, Chethady, Chengamanad.P.O, Kunnicode.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Sep 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLLAM

DATED THIS THE 20th DAY OF SEPTEMBER2021

Present: -        Sri.E.M.Muhammed Ibrahim, B.A, LLM. President

              Smt.S.Sandhya   Rani. Bsc, LLB ,Member

CC.No.108/2019       

  1. Thulaseedharan Nair,

           Sreekrishnalayam, Melila P.O.,                                              :           Complainants

          Kunnicode.

 

  1. K.L.Anilkumar,Anu Mandiram,

        Vallam, Kottarakkara P.O.

      V/s

  1. Dileep,

         Upasana, Thadimillinu Thekkumbhagom,

         Chethady,                                                              :         Opposite parties

        Chengamanadu P.O.,Kunnicode.

         (By Adv.V.Sugathan & Adv.Siju S.)

  1. Prasanna,W/o Dileep, Upasana,

         Thadimillinu Thekkumbhagom,Chethady,

         Chengamanadu P.O., Kunnicode.

          (By Adv.V.Sugathan & Adv.Siju S.)

                     

ORDER

Sri. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM , B.A, LLM,President

          Complainant absent today also.  Opposite parties represented.  As the complainant absent when the matter is posted for recording evidence and after receiving notice to that effect.  We are of the view that the complainant has no interest in giving any oral evidence only photocopies of certain documents produced.  Opposite parties’ advocate vehemently opposed in marked unattested photocopies.  Hence not marked.  As the complainant has not adduced any evidence  either oral or documentary the complaint is only to be dismissed.

          In the result complaint stands dismissed.

          No costs.

Dated this the 20th dayof September 2021.

 

                                                                        E.M .MUHAMMED IBRAHIM:Sd/-      

                                                          S.SANDHYA RANI:Sd/-

                                                                                                                                                                            Forwarded/by Order

                                                                                                                                                                             Senior superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. E.M.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. SANDHYA RANI.S]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.