View 33376 Cases Against Society
BHARTI RAWAT filed a consumer case on 10 Jul 2024 against DIAMOND MULTI STATE CO OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD in the North Consumer Court. The case no is CC/155/2023 and the judgment uploaded on 12 Jul 2024.
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I (North District)
[Govt. of NCT of Delhi]
Ground Floor, Court Annexe -2 Building, Tis Hazari Court Complex, Delhi- 110054
Phone: 011-23969372; 011-23912675 Email: confo-nt-dl@nic.in
Consumer Complaint No:155/2023
IN THE MATTER OF:
Ms. Bharti Rawat
W/o Sh. Makan Singh Rawat,
Flat No.1216,
Delhi Government Flats,
Gulabi Bagh, Delhi-110007 …. Complainant No.1
Sh. Makan Singh Rawat
S/o Late Mahender Singh Rawat
Flat No.1216,
Delhi Government Flats,
Gulabi Bagh, Delhi-110007. … Complainant No.2
Vs
Diamond Multi State Co-Operative
Group Housing Society Ltd.
(Through its Secretary)
Registered office
C-53, Chandar Nagar,
GF, Opposite Green Field Public School,
Ghaziabad, UP-201010.
Also at:
Corporate Office
303, 3rd Floor, Sector-5,
Dwarka, New Delhi-110075. … Opposite Party No.1
M/s Antriksh Group
Plot No.452, Sector-19,
Pocket-1, Dwarka,
New Delhi-110075. … Opposite Party No.2
ORDER
10/07/2024
Ashwani Kumar Mehta, Member:
1. The present complaint has been filed under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. The brief details of facts, as alleged by the Complainant in the Complaint in hand, are that:-
2. It has further been alleged that in the Month of March 2023, OP-1 said to the Complainant to initiate the process regarding the porting of booked flat through their agent by paying an amount of Rs.1,16,400/- and after porting of his booked flat, the above said porting fees will be refunded to the Complainant. With no option left, Complainant paid an amount of Rs.1,16,400 to the agent namely, Ms. Jasbeer Mattu, referred by OP-1, vide cheque number 912284 dated 27.03.2023. Copy of said cheque is enclosed with the complaint. When no such porting process was initiated, Complainant asked Ms. Jasbeer Mattu to return the fees paid to her for the porting. Consequent to which Ms. Jasbeer Mattu handed over a cheque in the name of the Complainant No.1 amounting of Rs.1,16,400 which was dishonoured due to insufficient fund. Copy of the said cheque along with Return memo is enclosed with the complaint. Thereafter, on 18.05.2023 and 25.05.2023, Complainant sent email to OP-1 regarding refund of the principal amount of Rs.9,94,020/- along with the porting fees amounting of Rs.1,16,400/- but OP-1 did not pay any heed to his request. Copies of the said email is enclosed with the complaint. Finally on 07.06.2023, Complainant sent a reminder email to OP-1 to refund her deposited amount along with the interest on which OP-1 replied that request for the cancellation of booking on behalf of the Complainant has already been received and after discussion with the management, OP-1 will respond to the Complainant but till date, OP-1 did not send any refund. Therefore, Complainants has no other option except to approach this forum for seeking the justice. The OP-2/Society, collected an amount of Rs.9,94,020/- from the Complainants but did not erect a single floor in their promised residential project. On the contrary, OPs used the hard earned money of the Complainant to other projects or their business purpose. It has, therefore, been prayed to:-
3. Accordingly, notices were issued to the OPs to defend the complaint before the commission but the notice could be served to OP-2 only. The notices issued to the OP-1 were received undelivered. Therefore, the notice to OP-1 was served by the publication. The Complainants have filed proof of service by way of publication qua OP-1 (newspaper dated 07.09.2023). As such, the service of notice has been considered complete. However, none appeared on behalf of OP-1 & OP-2 and they were proceeded ex-parte.
4. The Complainants have filed Evidence by way of Affidavits, reiterating the allegation levelled in complaint. Therefore, the complaint has been examined on the basis of the documents/evidences and material available on records. Since the OPs have chosen not to contest the allegations levelled in the complaint despite service, it is considered as deemed acceptance of the allegations levelled in the complaint. However, the material available on the record is sufficient to corroborate that the complainants have suffered directly due to deficient service on the part of the OPs in terms of the deficiency defined in the Act which includes any fault, imperfection, shortcoming or inadequacy in the quality, nature and manner of performance which is required to be maintained in relation to any service and includes any act of negligence or omission or commission by such person which causes loss or injury to the consumer.
5. It is settled principle of law that the Complainant cannot be expected to wait indefinitely for the possession as observed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Fortune Infrastructure and Anr. Vs. Trevor D’lima and Ors. [II (2018) CPJ I (SC)] that a person cannot be made to wait indefinitely for possession of flats allotted to him. They are entitled to seek refund of amount paid by them alongwith compensation. Therefore, we feel appropriate to direct the OP-1 to:-
6. It is clarified that the aforesaid amount shall be paid by the OPs, jointly and severally, within 30 days as directed above at para 5 (i), (ii) & (iii). In case, the abovesaid amount is not paid by the OP-1 to the Complainant within the period as directed above, the OP-1 shall be liable to pay interest @12% per annum from the date of expiry of 30 days period.
7. Order be given dasti to the parties in accordance with rules. Order be also uploaded on the website. Thereafter, file be consigned to the record room.
ASHWANI KUMAR MEHTA HARPREET KAUR CHARYA
Member Member
DCDRC-1 (North) DCDRC-1 (North)
DIVYA JYOTI JAIPURIAR
President
DCDRC-1 (North)
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.