BEFORE THE PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM: NUH.

                                                                         Consumer complaint No.02

                                                                        Date of Institution: 07.03.2017

                                                                        Date of Order: 28.09.2018

R.S.Raghave Retired Commandant CRPF R/o V.P.O. Nagina, Tehsil F.P.Jhhirka,Distt. Nuh Haryana

                               ….Complainant.

Versus

1.Dakshin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd through its excutive engineer DHBVN Nuh Haryana.

2.SDO DHBVN Nagina Distt.Nuh Haryana

                               …. Opposite party.

    Complaint under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

BEFORE       Mr.Rajbir Singh Dahiya, President.

           Mrs.Urmil Beniwal, Member.

Present:      complainant in person.

                  Mr.Khalil Ahmad, Advocate for the opposite party.

ORDER       R.S. DAHIYA, PRESIDENT.

                   Brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant is a consumer of respondent through meter number 424.That the electricity supply the complainant was disconnected from 30.12.2016 to 02.03.2017 by the Respondent. That the complainant complaints to the employee/officers of the respondents but they did not take any heed to the complaint. That the complainant is paying the electricity bill regularly. and he is facing mental and physical problems due to the non-supply of electricity and the complainant prayed that the electricity supply of meter no.424 be restored immediately  and he also prayed compension of Rupees. 30000/- for mental agony.

2.       After notice opposite party present through their counsel before the fourm and both the parties filled there evidence. Complainant filled his evidence marked as Ex-A to G and closed his evidence. Opposite party after tendering the documents Ex-R1 and R2 closed his evidence.

3.       Statements of parties and documents perused providing new route for the purpose of providing S.T. cable through the feeder of DHBVNL Nagina. Because, new houses were constructed near the house of the complainant and other persons and that required a new route and errection of polls for that purpose.

 4.      In every company or board there is a procedure for doing things like approval of the project, sanction of budget and the sanction of the plan for the same. The implementation of such project takes time and every project takes birth in view of the requirements of the consumers and the same happened in the present case.

5.       This concludes that there was no negligence or internal default on the part of the respondents. The respondents were under mandatory compulsion to disconnect the supply of the consumers for completion of the project which was for the benefits of the consumers at large. As such the complaint is dismissed being devoid of merits.

          File be consigned to the record room after due compliance. Certified copies be supplied to the parties free of cost.

Announced in open Court.

28.09.2018

(Urmil Beniwal)                                                                                                          (Rajbir Singh Dahiya)                        

    Member                                                                                                                          President,

                                                       District Consumer Disputes

                                                        Redressal Forum, Nuh