West Bengal

Paschim Midnapore

CC/5/2023

Sarbeswar Bera - Complainant(s)

Versus

Dharitri Infraverture Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Manas Sarkar

05 Nov 2024

ORDER

-1-

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

PASCHIM MEDINIPUR.

Samiran Dutta, Ld. President

-and-

Angshumati Nanda,Ld.Member.

 

Complaint Case No.C.C/05/2023

 

1. Sarbeswar Bera S/O Late Jitendra Nath Bera
2. Sunita Bera

W/o Sarbeswar Bera

Vill-akhilya, P.O. Sabang

Dist Paschim Mednipure

Pin- 721144

………….….……Complainant.

-Versus-

1. Dharitri Intraventure (P) Ltd.

DN 51, Merlin Infinite, 8th Floor,

P.S- Electronics Sector v, Salt lake city,

Kolkata 700091, Complex Police Station.

2. Dipanwita Samanta.
3. Vicky Sing

Both are the Director of the Dharitri

Intraventure (P) Ltd of DN 51, Merlin Infinite,

6th Floor, P.S-Electronics Complex P.S- Sector v,

Salt lake city, Kolkata 700091.

4. Sonali Dutta Refunding in Charge

DN 51, Merlin Infinite, 6th Floor, Sector v,

Salt lake city, Kolkata 700091

P.S- Electronics Complex Police Station.

        .........................Opposite parties

 

 

Date of filing: -10.01.23                                                                             Date of disposal:-05.11.24

Order No.31                                                                                                              

Contd..2.

-2-

       C.C. Case No. CC/05/2023

FINAL ORDER/JUDGEMENT.

Samiran Dutta, Ld. President:-

 

Complt files hazira through Ld. Advocate Somnath Guin. The case is fixed for exparte hearing. No step is taken by the O.P / builder who is found absent on repeated calls. The Complt. initially entered into an agreement on 30.08.2017 for purchase of a residential flat for Rs. 17,00,000/- out of which an earnest money of Rs. 4,00,000/- has been paid to the O.P under proper receipt. Subsequently that project was cancelled and the O.P entered into a fresh agreement on 03.04.2019 for purchase of a residential flat for the same consideration money on the assurance that the advance money of Rs. 4,00,000/- will be adjusted. O.P / Builder did not complete the apartment within the stipulated period as per terms and condition of the agreement of sale nor refunded the advance money despite several reminders and persuasion.

The complt. has therefore approached this Commission for appropriate relief.

Perused the petition of the Complt. and the relevant documents on record. Prima-facie case is established. The O.P builder having failed to deliver the flat as agreed upon the Complt. is entitled to get the refund of the earnest money.

The case therefore succeeds exparte.

Hence it is,

Ordered.

that the case be and the same is allowed exparte against O.P / Builder without cost. O.P./builder is directed to pay to the Complt. Rs. 4,00,000/- with litigation cost of Rs. 25,000/- within a month from this date in default law will take its own course. Let a plain copy of this order be given to the parties free of cost.

 

 

                                               

 

 

(Smt.A.Nanda)                                                                                                   (Samiran Dutta)

  Ld. Member                                                                                                                     Ld. President                                                                                                                                  District Commission

 Paschim Medinipur